Context is important in just about every aspect of life. Fantasy
football is no different. Much like life, fantasy football rarely
presents managers with the same variables day after day or week
after week. Truth be told, fantasy managers and analysts are usually
limited to statistical production - advanced analytics or the
common stats that appear in box scores - as a means to how well
a player is (or is not) performing.
One way to bring some level of context into fantasy projections
year after year is to analyze splits. Not just basic splits, mind
you. It does little good to point out how productive a running
back typically is in December because it is highly unlikely that
the changing of the calendar is the driving force behind the change.
Home/road splits can be helpful at times for predictive purposes,
but analysis needs to go much deeper than that to be helpful for
managers.
This week, we will attempt to do just that. I chose six of the
more impactful contextual splits I could think of and set out
on a journey to explain the how and why.
MIA players with and w/o Tua Tagovailoa
De'Von Achane
Split
G
Car
Ru Yds
YPC
Ru TDs
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
w/ Tua
11
13.0
56.5
4.3
0.5
6.6
6.1
48.2
7.9
0.5
91.8%
22.6
w/o Tua
6
10.0
47.7
4.8
0.2
2.3
1.8
10.3
5.6
0.0
78.6%
8.6
Diff
3.0
8.8
-0.4
0.3
4.3
4.3
37.8
2.3
0.5
13.2%
13.9
Now for the Miami pass-catchers …
Tyreek Hill
Split
G
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
w/ Tua
11
7.9
5.1
63.1
12.3
0.5
64.6%
14.7
w/o Tua
6
6.0
4.2
44.2
10.1
0.0
65.6%
8.6
Diff
1.9
0.9
18.9
2.2
0.5
-1.1%
6.1
Jaylen Waddle
Split
G
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
w/ Tua
11
5.3
4.1
58.1
13.5
0.2
74.7%
11.1
w/o Tua
5
6.0
3.4
32.6
9.8
0.0
58.2%
6.7
Diff
-0.7
0.7
25.5
3.7
0.2
16.5%
4.5
Jonnu Smith
Split
G
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
w/ Tua
11
6.9
5.6
56.9
10.3
0.5
78.7%
14.1
w/o Tua
6
5.8
4.3
43.0
10.0
0.5
63.2%
11.6
Diff
1.1
1.3
13.9
0.3
0.0
15.5%
2.4
Observations: One of the more common and notable
splits mentioned in the fantasy world this offseason is what happens
to the Dolphins' offense when Tua Tagovailoa is on the field versus
when he is hurt. Tagovailoa deals with his fair share of criticism,
but the numbers (focus on the numbers in the red) serve as a clear
reminder of how much value he brings to the offense over a replacement-level
quarterback. Of the 32 red numbers above, only three of them were
better with Tua on the sideline.
Achane's rushing production speaks for itself. It is mildly interesting
that his yards-per-carry average was significantly higher with
Tagovailoa on the field, although I have my doubts that it would
continue over a larger sample size. The much more significant
impact on Tagovailoa's presence on Achane was in the passing game,
as the latter saw nearly three times as many targets with Tua
as he did from the trio of Tyler Huntley, Skylar Thompson and
Tim Boyle. With Tagovailoa, fantasy managers could count on nearly
10 fantasy points per game from Achane just as a receiver (and
not including receiving touchdowns).
Unsurprisingly, Alvin Kamara was the only other running back
in the league who came remotely close to that kind of pace (8.7).
While not overly important for fantasy purposes, the difference
in catch rate is also somewhat striking. A 75-percent catch rate
should be the general expectation (or floor) for most running
backs, so it speaks to Tagovailoa's ability to make quick decisions
and put Achane in a position where he can do something after the
catch that Achane's catch rate when the two were together was
so high (91.8 percent).
The receiving splits are about what most fantasy managers would
expect for Hill, Waddle and Smith. The target, reception and yardage
numbers are down because the overall passing game volume dropped
without Tua. The touchdown numbers dropped because the offense
stunk. The catch rate dropped because the replacement quarterbacks
were largely unable to make the quick decisions Tagovailoa makes
or throw as accurately as he throws behind Miami's porous offensive
line. An underrated yet noteworthy observation is how much difference
there was in Hill and Waddle's yards per catch with and without
Tagovailoa. Once again, this speaks to Tagovailoa's ability to
make quick decisions and put his pass-catchers in a position where
they can do something after the catch.
It should not come as a huge surprise that Smith was the player
least affected by Tagovailoa's absence since tight ends in most
offenses run the most quarterback-friendly routes (short and over
the middle of the field). The Dolphins are no exception.
2025 Impact: The difference in the Dolphins'
offense with and without Tagovailoa has been well chronicled over
the years. It is reasonable to have doubts that Zach Wilson or
Quinn Ewers will have much more success than Huntley, Thompson
and Boyle did in 2024 or any of the other backup quarterbacks
Miami has rostered in the Tagovailoa era. However, there are reasons
for slight optimism regarding his supporting cast this year, at
least in terms of reducing how much time Tua could miss and the
huge disparity in efficiency when he is not on the field.
Without question, the offensive line took a hit when LT Terron
Armstead retired. However, I would argue that eliminating interior
pressure is more important for a quarterback like Tagovailoa than
it is for other quarterbacks. If LG James Daniels and RG Jonah
Savaiinaea are what the Dolphins hope they are and C Aaron Brewer
can continue to play well, then interior pressure should be less
of a concern than it has been recently. Better interior play up
front also opens up the run threat for Achane and Jaylen Wright,
which was a big part of what was missing with the Dolphins in
2024. A more dynamic running game adds more bite to play-action
and slows down the pass rush, which should theoretically allow
Hill and Waddle to run deeper routes while maintaining high catch
rates.
With regards to how disappointing Waddle was last season, we
need to bear in mind that complementary receivers usually suffer
the most when quarterbacks miss time. It does not help Waddle's
cause that he is consistently battling some kind of injury, but
his first-read rate ranked 77th in the league last season (17.7
percent). (In 2023, he ranked 36th at 24.6 percent.) Behind a
poor offensive line and on an offense that had an inconsistent-at-best
running game, there is almost no time for a quarterback to get
to his third read in the progression, so Miami quarterbacks tended
to go Hill-Smith or Hill-Achane instead of Hill-Waddle-Smith/Achane.
Waddle's fall from grace in 2024 was not caused by Smith's emergence,
but rather the combination of several personnel shortcomings as
much as anything.
The June 30 trade that sent Smith to the Steelers is an interesting
one, but do not make the mistake of assuming 33-year-old Darren Waller will simply take over Smith's 2024 role in the offense.
First and foremost, Waller was a seam-stretcher in his prime.
Smith has long been a short aDOT player who does his best work
after the catch. Secondly, Waller is old in NFL years, did not
play at all last year and did not come close to playing a full
season in any of his last three pre-retirement seasons. Smith's
production was likely to take a hit in 2025 anyway if the offensive
line play improved, if only because very little in HC Mike McDaniel's
history suggests he wants to rely heavily on a low-aDOT pass-catcher.
Waller will pick up some of the 111 targets Smith leaves behind,
but the willingness to trade for the former Raider and Giant signals
at least a slight belief from the coaching staff that the offensive
line will hold up better.
Assuming he can stay healthy, Achane could reasonably push for
100 targets with Smith no longer around to take some of the shorter
targets. Hill still feels like a big risk given his age and attitude,
but a return to 150-plus targets is a possibility if he keeps
his head on straight. Waddle can be considered a bet against a
potential Hill blow-up (in which he would have high-end fantasy
WR1 upside) or a Waller injury, but the fact of the matter is
that Tagovailoa should be better protected and Miami should have
a better ground game than it did last year. If any/all of that
happens (including what I said about Hill and Waller), then a
WR15-20 finish should be well within the realm of possibilities
for Waddle.
Chase Brown before and after Zack Moss' season-ending neck injury
Zack Moss played seven weeks before suffering his season-ending
neck injury in Week 8. Let's look at how the workload was shared
in the Bengals' backfield in the first seven games:
Bengals Backfield
Player
Split
G
Car
Ru Yds
Ru TDs
YPC
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
Brown
Before Moss injury
7
9.4
46.7
0.4
5.0
2.4
2.0
8.4
4.2
0.1
82.4 %
10.9
Moss
Before Moss injury
7
9.9
33.0
0.3
3.3
3.3
2.7
22.7
8.4
0.1
82.6 %
10.9
Diff
-0.5
13.7
0.1
1.7
-0.9
-0.7
-14.3
-4.2
0.0
-0.2
0.0
Bengals Backfield
Player
Split
G
Car
Ru Yds
Ru TDs
YPC
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
Brown
After Moss injury
8
18.9
78.9
0.4
4.2
5.5
4.8
37.4
7.9
0.4
86.4 %
20.9
Brown
Before Moss injury
7
9.4
46.7
0.4
5.0
2.4
2.0
8.4
4.2
0.1
82.4 %
10.9
Diff
9.5
32.2
0.0
-0.8
3.1
2.8
28.9
3.7
0.3
4.0
10.0
Observations: The stunner in the pre-Moss injury split was Moss
being more active than Brown as a pass-catcher. It would have
been one thing if Moss entered 2024 with a reputation as being
one of the league's best pass-pro backs. (He did not.) It would
have been one thing if Moss had even one season in which he was
a major contributor as a receiver. (His best season was 27 catches
on 37 targets for 192 yards and two touchdowns for the Colts in
2023.) The fact that it took an injury to Moss for Brown to get
the work he deserved as a receiver still blows my mind.
For what it is worth, the Bengals seemed to be on the verge of
committing to Brown more often at the time of Moss' injury, considering
the former held a 37-21 edge in rush attempts in Weeks 5-7. After
the injury, Brown was truly the only show in town before Cincinnati
started to spoon-feed Khalil Herbert some carries starting in
Week 13. In true Bengals' fashion, almost nothing changed in Cincy's
backfield after the injury. Brown's 18.9 carries in eight non-Moss
games were only 0.5 carries more than the duo averaged before
the injury. The difference in rushing yards (79.7-78.9), targets
(5.7-5.5), receptions (4.8- 4.7), receiving yards (37.4-31.1)
and fantasy points per game (20.9-20.8) were also negligible across
the board.
2025 Impact: To what degree this affects the perception of Brown
depends on how much of a threat fantasy managers believe Tahj Brooks and/or Samaje Perine are. (Or maybe Moss if he is cleared
from the neck injury.) Brooks is a player who probably would have
been selected in the third or fourth round of the 2024 NFL Draft
but fell to the sixth round of this year's draft due to the depth
at the position. He is at least as good now as Moss has ever been.
Perine has consistently been lauded for his ability to contribute
in most facets of the passing game. Both men - Perine over eight
NFL seasons and Brooks in college (obviously) - are considered
very good blockers.
I do not think Brown will come close to the 23-plus touches he
was averaging after Moss' injury in 2025. Then again, what team
expects its top running back to do that? It comes down to answering
a couple of questions, in my opinion. Was Perine signed to be
a mentor and handle some snaps as a pass protector because the
Bengals' line figures to have issues in pass protection? Was Brooks
drafted as a clear backup to Brown or because Cincinnati has some
lingering doubts about Brown being able to handle 300-plus touches?
My answer to the first question is that I believe Perine will
be used almost exclusively on third down and when the Bengals
expect a blitz. My answer to the second question is that I think
Cincinnati wants to feature Brown. With that said, I think Brooks
- even if he handles only 3-4 touches per game - ends up being
more of a thorn in the side of Brown than many expect.
Will Brown remain a fantasy RB1? I think so (and
so does OC Dan Pitcher), but expectations should be dialed
back from last year's workhorse usage. Expect Brown to top out
around 18 touches most weeks. It is a good number for any back,
but it is a sizable drop-off from the 23.7 he saw down the stretch.
Bo Nix/Courtland Sutton 1st half vs. 2nd half of season
Bo Nix: 1st Half vs. 2nd Half
of Season
Split
G
Cmp
Att
Cmp %
Yds
TDs
INTs
Car
Ru Yds
YPC
Ru TDs
FPTs/G
Weeks 8-18
10
23.9
34.3
69.7%
252.9
2.4
0.7
4.5
17.5
3.9
0.1
22.1
Weeks 1-7
7
19.6
32.0
61.7%
178.0
0.7
0.7
6.7
36.4
5.4
0.4
16.2
Diff
4.3
2.3
8.0%
74.9
1.7
0.0
-2.2
-18.9
-1.5
-0.3
5.9
Courtland Sutton: 1st Half vs.
2nd Half of Season
Split
G
Tgt %
Tgt
Rec
Yds
Y/R
TDs
C %
FPts/G
Weeks 8-18
10
25.1%
8.8
6.0
80.4
13.4
0.6
68.2%
17.6
Weeks 1-7
7
20.5%
6.7
3.0
39.6
13.2
0.3
44.7%
8.7
Diff
4.6%
2.1
3.0
40.8
0.2
0.3
23.5%
8.9
Observations: While most of the football-loving world was watching
Denver run 35 times for 225 yards and two touchdowns on a Thursday
night against the Saints last year, HC Sean Payton saw an opportunity
to lean more heavily on his rookie quarterback after he (Nix)
just finished his third game with 27 or fewer passing attempts
in four weeks. Nix did not attempt fewer than 30 throws again
until the Broncos' Week 18 rout of the Chiefs.
In other words, Nix's 32 pass attempts per game from Weeks 1-7
were heavily inflated by the 42 throws he made in a Week 1 loss
to the Seahawks. In his next six outings, he averaged 30.3. Over
the remainder of the season (Weeks 8-18), he averaged 34.3. I
realize that does not sound like a huge deal and it would not
have been unless it had been accompanied by at least two other
major developments. Nix's catchable throw percentage improved
by almost 10 percent to 78.7 percent in Weeks 8-18 while his deep-throw
percentage stayed the same (12.5 percent). Nix's TD luck also
turned around dramatically, posting a 3.4 TD-to-INT ratio over
the final 10 contests.
It is also easy to see one other likely cause-and-effect scenario
at play here. While Nix attempted 2.3 more passes per game in
Weeks 8-18, it is probably more than a mere coincidence that Sutton's
targets increased by 2.1. At the very least, it means there was
an obvious push to get Sutton more involved after he did not see
a target in Week 7 (25.1 percent target share beginning in Week
8). Although some of the push likely came from Payton, it is also
clear that Nix and Sutton were much more in sync after the game
against the Saints, as evidenced by the 23.5 percent increase
in catch rate. More targets and a higher catch rate from Sutton
unsurprisingly led to Sutton being the overall WR11 from Week
8 until the end of the fantasy season (WR48 from Weeks 1-7).
2025 Impact: It is nearly impossible to predict just how much
of an effect an improved rushing attack (i.e., J.K. Dobbins and
RJ Harvey) will have on the Denver offense this year and how
much it will impact Nix's passing-game volume. Payton needs to
find targets for Evan Engram and Dobbins/Harvey since they will
command more looks than their predecessors. Payton is no stranger
to a high-volume passing attack (Drew Brees attempted at least
40 passes per game nine times during his 15-year career with the
Saints), so it would not be shocking if he chooses that route.
One of the problems with that thinking, however, is that the
Broncos should have one of the best defenses in the league, so
Nix should be expected to throw fewer passes in 2025 than he did
as a rookie. Barring unreal positive regression in the touchdown
department (last year's 5.1 percent TD rate was good, especially
for how slow he started), Nix will probably not be able to repeat
last year's QB9 finish.
As far as Sutton is concerned, his 25.1-percent team target share
from Weeks 8-18 is also unlikely to be repeated. Engram will earn
more targets than the 72 that Denver tight ends recorded a season
ago. Marvin Mims will probably see more than 52 looks. The running
backs should match or exceed last year's 117 targets at that position.
Payton
also appears to be smitten with rookie Pat Bryant. There does
not appear to be a likely scenario that allows Sutton to see a
quarter of the team's targets again in 2025. With that said, there
is a decent chance Sutton can beat last year's eight receiving
touchdowns as the unquestioned WR1 in a very good offense. Although
Sutton is unlikely to finish as a top-15 receiver for a second
straight year, it would be a shock if he falls outside the top
25.
Josh Downs with Joe Flacco vs. Anthony Richardson
Josh Downs
Split
G
Tgt
Rec
C %
Yds
TDs
FPts/G
w/Joe Flacco
7
9.3
7.0
75.4%
64.9
0.3
15.2
w/Anthony Richardson
10
4.1
2.2
53.7%
34.9
0.3
7.5
Diff
5.2
4.8
21.7%
30.0
0.0
7.7
Observations: Without trying to sound like Captain Obvious, the
numbers speak for themselves. Downs' 17-game pace with Flacco
would have been 119 catches for 1,103 yards and five touchdowns.
(For context, that is roughly what Jaxon Smith-Njigba did last
year, plus almost 20 catches.) Downs' 17-game pace with Richardson
was 37 catches for 593 yards and five touchdowns. Not much more
needs to be said.
One more bit of context needs to be mentioned, however. Flacco
averaged 35.4 pass attempts in the seven games he either started
or came on in relief of an injured Richardson. By contrast, Richardson
averaged 26 pass attempts in the 10 games he started and finished.
2025 Impact: Flacco was hardly a high-level quarterback last
year at 39 years old. Despite being inconsistent, however, he
was capable. Richardson was not, most of the time. Flacco's catchable
throw rate was 11 percent higher than Richardson's (74.6-63.6)
and his off-target throw rate was 8.4 percent lower (26.5-18.1).
While I will continue to hold out hope that Richardson's offseason
work (with the same biometrics expert that helped Josh Allen improve
his mechanical flaws early in his career) pays off, it seems almost
a fait accompli that Daniel Jones will be named the starting quarterback
during the preseason. Roughly 75 percent of Downs' targets over
his first two NFL seasons have come within 10 yards of the line
of scrimmage. Similarly, Jones has not thrown more than 10 percent
of his passes more than 20 yards down the field in a season since
his rookie year in 2019. (Jones has not targeted the intermediate
part of the field - between 10-19 yards - more than 20 percent
of the time in any of the last three seasons.) In short, what
Downs does well and where Jones likes to throw matches up well.
The threat of TE Tyler Warren stealing some of Downs' short targets
is a real one, if only because the rookie should be a tone-setter
for an offense that needs a player other than Jonathan Taylor
capable of setting a tone. Downs also does not play as much as
most might expect (last year's 72.9 percent routes run per team
drop-back ranked third on the team and 63rd across the league).
Downs does not come without risk in fantasy.
The case for him is simple: his 23.9 percent target share tied
George Pickens for the 16th-highest mark in the league, while
his 0.3 targets per route run ranked eighth (both ranks based
on players who played at least 10 games). He is the No. 1 target
in Indy. Warren may steal that title at some point, but it probably
will not be this year. Downs has legit high-end WR2 upside when
he plays with a competent quarterback, as we saw last season when
he posted at least 14.2 fantasy points in five of Flacco's seven
starts. Expect more of the same in 2025 with Jones as his quarterback.
The Eagles' offense during and after a 2-2 start
Eagles Offense
Split
Pts/G
Pa Att
Cmp
Cmp %
Pa Yds
TDs
INTs
PaTD %
Car
Ru Yds
YPC
Ru TDs
Weeks 1-4
21.5
33.0
22.5
68.2%
211.8
1.0
1.0
3.0%
30.0
153.8
5.1
1.5
Weeks 5-16
29.8
23.3
15.7
67.5%
172.5
1.4
0.2
5.9%
39.5
200.3
5.0
2.0
Diff
-8.3
9.7
6.8
0.7%
39.2
-0.4
0.8
-2.9%
-9.5
-46.5
0.1
-0.5
Observations: Philadelphia had the luxury of an early bye in
2024, which gave then-new OC Kellen Moore and HC Nick Sirianni
time to re-evaluate what they hoped the offense could become.
The Eagles had just completed a stretch in which they scored 21
or fewer points in three straight contests. Part of their issue
during the 2-2 start was committing eight turnovers, five of which
could be tied to Jalen Hurts (four interceptions and one last
fumble). At any rate, Hurts' flaws were being exposed as Philly
asked him to throw 33 times per game. It was during the same four-game
stretch that he took 13 sacks.
Moore and Sirianni put their heads together during the team's
Week 5 bye and began to unleash the beast that led to the team's
12-1 finish to the regular season. Hurts never attempted more
than 30 passes again and only threw one more interception. The
number of sacks he took per game dropped from 3.3 to 1.9. Of course,
we know part of the reason why this happened. Cooper DeJean became
a full-time player to help turn around the defense and the offense
committed to the ground game, reducing how often the team needed
to rely on Hurts' arm.
Saquon Barkley went from a player who averaged 18.3 carries to
22.7 (if we include the Week 17 game in which Hurts was injured
early). Barkley's TD rate dropped a bit, but it did not matter
at this point because he was averaging 24.5 touches behind arguably
the best offensive line in the game.
It is easy to see why Philadelphia's pass-catchers disappointed
after September. Hurts averaged around 16 completions for three-plus
months and did not need to throw more than that. After giving
up 24 points per game before the bye, the Eagles yielded only
16 per game afterward. The big difference - outside of the obvious
rushing and passing yardage averages - was the dramatic improvement
in scoring. Philadelphia averaged 3.4 TDs from Week 6 (2.5 before)
and saw a half-touchdown bump in passing AND rushing scores.
2025 Impact: Moore left to coach the Saints, which led to the
Eagles naming Kevin Patullo as the new offensive coordinator after
he served as the team's pass game coordinator over the previous
four seasons. If we can take TE Dallas Goedert at his word, Patullo
appears
to want this year's offense to look more like the pre-bye version
from 2024. This does not make a ton of sense based on what worked
so well last season, but it may need to be what Philadelphia needs
to do this year. Why? Barkley is coming off a season in which
he handled 482 touches. History tells us that the odds of any
back - much less a 28-year-old - coming off such a high-usage
season will probably experience a significant dip in production
or miss multiple games, if not both. It would behoove Patullo
to make sure he has a passing game to fall back on if/when Barkley
cannot play.
Projecting this offense to find the middle ground in terms of
run-pass balance - maybe 32 passes and 30 runs per game - seems
like a bit of a cop-out, but it is probably what Sirianni and
Patullo would prefer, even if Barkley plays every game. If that
ends up being the case, then the market is probably undervaluing
A.J. Brown as the 10th receiver off the board in early drafts
and really undervaluing DeVonta Smith as the 26th receiver (especially
when he has not finished lower than WR20 on a points-per-game
basis in any of the last three years). Similarly, TE15 is probably
too low for Goedert and QB5 is probably Hurts' floor if Philadelphia
returns to being a team that is willing to throw at least 30 times
per game.
Josh Jacobs before and after his touchdown luck turned
Josh Jacobs
Split
G
Car
Ru Yds
YPC
Ru TDs
Tgt
Rec
C %
Yds
TDs
FPts/G
Weeks 7-17
10
18.7
82.1
4.4
1.3
2.8
2.4
85.7%
23.9
0.1
21.4
Weeks 1-6
6
18.0
77.3
4.3
0.2
2.3
1.8
78.6%
16.8
0.0
12.3
Diff
0.7
4.8
0.1
1.1
0.5
0.6
7.1
7.1
0.1
11.1
Observations: It is remarkable how little difference there is
across the board from the time Jacobs was hanging out in fantasy
RB2 land versus when he became a fantasy force. The driving force
was a big one, however. Touchdowns are the lifeblood of fantasy
football and there is probably no better recent example of that
in 2024 than Jacobs scoring at least one in 10 of his last 11
outings - including eight straight to close out the regular season
- after finding the end zone just once through six contests. While
some of that can be attributed to better touchdown luck, the fact
of the matter is Green Bay relied much more heavily on him in
the red zone after Week 6. He was also put in a better position
to score touchdowns after the first six games.
Weeks 1-6: Jacobs handled 15 carries and earned
two targets inside the 20. Of those 17 touches (an average of
2.8 per game), only seven came within five yards of the goal line.
Another four came from the 10 or closer.
Weeks 7-17: Jacobs handled 43 carries and earned
two targets inside the 20. Of those 45 touches (an average of
4.5 per game), 18 came within five yards of the goal line. Another
14 came from the 10 or closer.
Jacobs' 32 carries for 151 yards in Week 2 - a.k.a. the Malik Willis start in which Green Bay called 53 running plays - obviously
throws off the Weeks 1-6 numbers a bit as well. With that said,
the funny thing about Jacobs' 2024 campaign is that better touchdown
luck and a more stubborn effort by HC Matt LaFleur to let him
finish drives after Week 6 were about the only things that changed
for Jacobs and made him a fantasy stud after a ho-hum start.
2025 Impact:Jordan Love's injuries (knee early, groin later)
may have been the push LaFleur needed to lean on Jacobs more heavily
near the goal line after Week 6. Jacobs was also helped by the
absence of MarShawn Lloyd and a plethora of injuries at receiver.
While it is possible he handles something close to the 337 touches
he had in his first season as a Packer, do not count on it. Green
Bay will undoubtedly want to get a return on Lloyd after a lost
rookie season. Furthermore, the Packers spent a first-round pick
on WR Matthew Golden and a third-round selection on a Cordarrelle Patterson clone in Savion Williams. LaFleur also learned to trust
backups Emanuel Wilson and Chris Brooks more as last season progressed.
Green Bay should be a good offense again in 2025 and will likely
lean heavily on Jacobs near the goal line after he enjoyed the
success in that area that he did after Week 6. Thus, I would expect
him to score 10-plus touchdowns again. I think it is more unlikely
he averages 98.3 total yards and 19.8 touches again, however.
Jacobs and the offensive environment are too good for him to fall
flat this season, but managers expecting a continuation of what
he did from Week 7 on a year ago are bound to be disappointed
this fall.
Doug Orth has served as an analyst for FF Today since 2006 and
joined the Fantasy Points team before the start of the 2024 season.
He is also a highly successful high-stakes player who has not experienced
a losing money season in any of his 25 years in this hobby. Please
check him out on "The Football Diehards" podcast - courtesy
of Full Time Fantasy - on Wednesday nights with co-host JJ Wenner.