A d v e r t i s e m e n t
One of the more commonly-held beliefs in fantasy football is that
more opportunity leads to more success. It’s hardly a shocking
revelation since it tends to be true quite often in the real world.
Many will find it surprising that only one player that led the
league in “opportunities” (attempts, touches or targets)
last year went on to lead his position in fantasy points (Calvin
Johnson). In fact, he’s the only player over the last two
seasons to do so. By comparison, teammate Matthew Stafford (727
attempts) shattered the previous NFL record for attempts in a
season (691) and finished as the 11th-best quarterback. Simply
put, the most opportunity does not necessarily lead to the most
success; there are simply too many other factors at work in the
game of football.
The goal of last week’s Red
Zone Report was to serve as a main dish to what should be
a rather appetizing dessert this week. If red zone play-calling,
production and efficiency give us some idea as to what teams and
players will do in scoring territory, then it only makes sense
that analyzing the number of opportunities that players receive
– and the consistency at which they get them – anywhere
on the field should help us uncover the most “stable”
fantasy properties and potential “boom-or-bust” candidates.
While there will always been sudden stars and unexpected occurrences
during the course of the season no matter how much we crunch the
numbers, fantasy owners that are the least surprised often find
themselves in the best position to make a fantasy championship
run.
Along with the Red Zone Report, my hope is that you simply observe
the data I have collected over the last two weeks and reach some
solid conclusions about the players that will grace our rosters
over the next 1-2 months. Even though September 5 (the Thursday
night season opener) is not far away, we still have plenty of
time to discuss the overvalued and undervalued fantasy players
over the next month as I begin releasing my team projections next
week. For now, my advice is to just focus on the information and
draw some conclusions on your own as you sort through the information.
The goal, as always, is to make sure you are easily the most knowledgeable
and informed owner in the room on draft day.
After each chart, you will find some statistical observations
followed by a “fantasy impact” section. Although I
tried to mix one in with the other in order to keep it light,
my hope is that you focus mostly on the information below that
you will be hard-pressed to find anywhere else.
Key to the table below:
Fant – Player’s rank
in a PPR fantasy league where all touchdowns are worth six points.
0-20% - This column represents the
percentage of games in which a quarterback attempted 20 throws
or less. (By extension, 21-30% represents the percentage of games
a quarterback attempted between 21-30 passes, and so on.)
0-20 - This column represents the
actual number of games in which a quarterback attempted 20 throws
or less. (Just like the sentence above, 21-30 represents the number
of games a quarterback attempted between 21-30 passes, and so
on.)
Note #1: Quarterbacks
had to play in at least eight games. “**” denotes
a player – Nick Foles in this case – that did not
make the cut but figure to have some impact in 2013.
Note #2: You may
sort the table by clicking on the column headers.
Quarterback
Attempts - 2012 |
Rk |
Fant |
QB |
Tm |
G |
0-20% |
21-30% |
0-30% |
31-40% |
40+% |
31+% |
0-20 |
21-30 |
0-30 |
31-40 |
40+ |
31+ |
1 |
1 |
Drew Brees |
NO |
16 |
0.0% |
12.5% |
12.5% |
25.0% |
62.5% |
87.5% |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
14 |
2 |
2 |
Aaron Rodgers |
GB |
16 |
0.0% |
25.0% |
25.0% |
62.5% |
12.5% |
75.0% |
0 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
3 |
3 |
Tom Brady |
NE |
16 |
0.0% |
6.3% |
6.3% |
56.3% |
37.5% |
93.8% |
0 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
6 |
15 |
4 |
4 |
Peyton Manning |
DEN |
16 |
0.0% |
18.8% |
18.8% |
56.3% |
25.0% |
81.3% |
0 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
4 |
13 |
5 |
5 |
Matt Ryan |
ATL |
16 |
0.0% |
12.5% |
12.5% |
56.3% |
31.3% |
87.5% |
0 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
5 |
14 |
6 |
6 |
Cam Newton |
CAR |
16 |
6.3% |
43.8% |
50.0% |
50.0% |
0.0% |
50.0% |
1 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
7 |
Robert Griffin III |
WAS |
15 |
20.0% |
53.3% |
73.3% |
26.7% |
0.0% |
26.7% |
3 |
8 |
11 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
Tony Romo |
DAL |
16 |
0.0% |
18.8% |
18.8% |
37.5% |
43.8% |
81.3% |
0 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
9 |
Russell Wilson |
SEA |
16 |
25.0% |
56.3% |
81.3% |
18.8% |
0.0% |
18.8% |
4 |
9 |
13 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
10 |
Andrew Luck |
IND |
16 |
0.0% |
25.0% |
25.0% |
31.3% |
43.8% |
75.0% |
0 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
12 |
11 |
11 |
Matthew Stafford |
DET |
16 |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.0% |
18.8% |
81.3% |
100.0% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
16 |
12 |
12 |
Andy Dalton |
CIN |
16 |
6.3% |
37.5% |
43.8% |
31.3% |
25.0% |
56.3% |
1 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
13 |
13 |
Josh Freeman |
TB |
16 |
6.3% |
37.5% |
43.8% |
31.3% |
25.0% |
56.3% |
1 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
14 |
14 |
Eli Manning |
NYG |
16 |
0.0% |
43.8% |
43.8% |
37.5% |
18.8% |
56.3% |
0 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
15 |
15 |
Joe Flacco |
BAL |
16 |
6.3% |
31.3% |
37.5% |
37.5% |
25.0% |
62.5% |
1 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
16 |
16 |
Ben Roethlisberger |
PIT |
13 |
7.7% |
23.1% |
30.8% |
53.8% |
15.4% |
69.2% |
1 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
9 |
17 |
17 |
Matt Schaub |
HOU |
16 |
0.0% |
31.3% |
31.3% |
56.3% |
12.5% |
68.8% |
0 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
2 |
11 |
18 |
18 |
Sam Bradford |
STL |
16 |
6.3% |
31.3% |
37.5% |
43.8% |
18.8% |
62.5% |
1 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
19 |
19 |
Carson Palmer |
OAK |
15 |
6.7% |
13.3% |
20.0% |
40.0% |
40.0% |
80.0% |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
20 |
20 |
Ryan Fitzpatrick |
BUF |
16 |
12.5% |
18.8% |
31.3% |
68.8% |
0.0% |
68.8% |
2 |
3 |
5 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
21 |
21 |
Philip Rivers |
SD |
16 |
12.5% |
18.8% |
31.3% |
43.8% |
25.0% |
68.8% |
2 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
11 |
22 |
22 |
Christian Ponder |
MIN |
16 |
12.5% |
43.8% |
56.3% |
31.3% |
12.5% |
43.8% |
2 |
7 |
9 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
23 |
23 |
Jay Cutler |
CHI |
15 |
6.7% |
46.7% |
53.3% |
40.0% |
6.7% |
46.7% |
1 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
24 |
24 |
Ryan Tannehill |
MIA |
16 |
6.3% |
50.0% |
56.3% |
37.5% |
6.3% |
43.8% |
1 |
8 |
9 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
25 |
25 |
Brandon Weeden |
CLE |
15 |
6.7% |
26.7% |
33.3% |
46.7% |
20.0% |
66.7% |
1 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
26 |
26 |
Colin Kaepernick |
SF |
13 |
46.2% |
38.5% |
84.6% |
15.4% |
0.0% |
15.4% |
6 |
5 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
27 |
Michael Vick |
PHI |
10 |
10.0% |
20.0% |
30.0% |
40.0% |
30.0% |
70.0% |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
28 |
28 |
Jake Locker |
TEN |
11 |
18.2% |
36.4% |
54.5% |
18.2% |
27.3% |
45.5% |
2 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
29 |
29 |
Alex Smith |
SF |
10 |
30.0% |
50.0% |
80.0% |
20.0% |
0.0% |
20.0% |
3 |
5 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
30 |
30 |
Mark Sanchez |
NYJ |
15 |
20.0% |
40.0% |
60.0% |
20.0% |
20.0% |
40.0% |
3 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
31 |
31 |
Chad Henne |
JAC |
10 |
30.0% |
10.0% |
40.0% |
20.0% |
40.0% |
60.0% |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
32 |
32 |
Blaine Gabbert |
JAC |
10 |
30.0% |
10.0% |
40.0% |
50.0% |
10.0% |
60.0% |
3 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
33 |
34 |
Nick Foles** |
PHI |
7 |
0.0% |
14.3% |
14.3% |
42.9% |
42.9% |
85.7% |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
34 |
35 |
Matt Cassel |
KC |
9 |
22.2% |
22.2% |
44.4% |
22.2% |
33.3% |
55.6% |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
35 |
36 |
Matt Hasselbeck |
TEN |
8 |
25.0% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
25.0% |
25.0% |
50.0% |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
36 |
37 |
Brady Quinn |
KC |
10 |
40.0% |
40.0% |
80.0% |
20.0% |
0.0% |
20.0% |
4 |
4 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
Observations: In 2011, only five
of the top 10 quarterbacks that ranked in the top 10 in highest
percentage of games over 31 attempts (31+) finished in the top
10 in fantasy points. In 2012, the number increased to six. Why
is this notable? Given the number of teams that could/did run
read-option plays, the majority of the top 10 was still ruled
by the quarterbacks that are primarily pocket passers.
For the second year in a row, we saw the law of diminishing returns
at quarterback; more volume didn’t necessarily lead to more
fantasy points – although 2012 did see more quarterbacks
thrive with the extra work. Of the 12 quarterbacks that played
at least 15-16 games and attempted 41+ throws in at least 25%
of their games, 10 finished among the top 15. In 2011, only nine
signal-callers met that threshold and six were top-15 quarterbacks.
While 41+% doesn’t appear to be as great of a predictor
for fantasy success as it should be, the number of games in which
signal-callers recorded 41+ attempts proved to be a good benchmark
to reach in 2012. Of the 13 quarterbacks to post four or more
games with 41+ attempts, 10 finished in the top 15 in fantasy
points. Only Palmer (constantly in comeback mode), Henne (part-time
starter) and Rivers (awful offensive line) found themselves on
the outside looking in. In 2011, it was six of 12.
The read-option did make a rather sizable impact last season.
In 2011, only Rodgers (46.7), Newton (37.5) and Ryan (31.3) finished
among the top 16 fantasy quarterbacks with at least 30% of their
games falling into the 0-30% category. In 2012, three of the top
11 – Wilson, Griffin and Newton ranked among the top 10
fantasy quarterbacks while Kaepernick would have almost certainly
been included in that group had he been named the starter before
Week 11.
Fantasy impact: Although more
attempts would seem to be more of a good thing, remember why quarterbacks
often air it out that often: because their team is trailing. Defenses
are willing to trade yards in order to melt the clock, but quarterbacks
often force throws in those situations in an effort to move the
ball downfield quicker. High-risk plays can be big plays…for
either side. After the elite signal-callers are gone, targeting
a non-elite quarterback that lives in the 31-40 attempt neighborhood
is a solid move for fantasy owners. Elite quarterbacks (Peyton
Manning, Brady, Brees, etc.) have earned the right from their
coaches to attempt more throws because they have proven they will
not put the offense in harm’s way, regardless of the situation.
Stafford was last year’s best example that sheer volume
doesn’t mean everything; very few quarterbacks can overcome
the loss of their explosive pass-catching back (Jahvid Best) and
three receivers (Nate Burleson, Titus Young and Ryan Broyles)
who all figured prominently into their plans going into last season.
Conversely, Rodgers has proven two years in a row the combination
of running ability and passing efficiency means a lot; only three
of his 31 games over the past two seasons have featured more than
41 attempts. (He has accumulated 17 games of 31-40 attempts and
11 with fewer than 30 throws.)
Running
Backs
Suggestions, comments,
musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and appeared in
USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine in 2010 and
2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy
football internet chat every Sunday this past season. Doug regularly
appears as a fantasy football analyst on Sirius XM’s “Fantasy
Drive” and for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C).
He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association. |