Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      




 


Staff Writer
Email Doug

Doug's Articles

Preseason Schedule Analysis
AFC East & AFC North Breakdowns
7/27/10
AFC: East / North | South & West
NFC: East / North | South & West

AFC East: BUF | MIA | NE | NYJ
AFC North: BAL | CIN | CLE | PIT

Every owner wants to hit on the next big thing in fantasy; that much is no secret. But how do we identify those “breakout players”? Much of the fantasy community is focused on just a few of the factors (age, offensive role, talent, player history and supporting cast are often the most common characteristics used by many “experts”) to project a player for the upcoming season.

In this day and age, I find it amazing that such a small percentage of fantasy owners acknowledge the importance of the opponents when it comes to projecting player performance. Somewhere along with the five aforementioned factors (plus countless more), I believe predictive schedule analysis – when used correctly – provides a huge advantage over the competition. Any veteran fantasy football owner knows it is nearly pointless to use last season's numbers as an indicator of how a defense will fare this season, which is a big reason I go to the trouble of analyzing defense like I did last week. It stands to reason that if teams like St. Louis and Tampa Bay will once again struggle on defense - even after all the changes both teams made - that I want to see them more often on my fantasy players' schedule than I do on someone else's. Likewise, why do I want any of my players facing the New York Jets in the fantasy playoffs?

Allow me to clear up a couple of misconceptions about schedule analysis right away:

  1. this is not a strength of schedule article that uses 2009 results to predict 2010 and

  2. the schedule contributes to the projection of a player in this system, but it is far from the only determining factor I use.

Furthermore, I do not use the PSAs to justify taking a tier-two or three player over a tier-one player. Tier-one players perform well in just about every situation against just about any defense, in large part because tier-one players are the clear-cut standout performers on their team. Tier-two players and all the players below them often do not have life quite as easy, thus, they are more affected by factors such as playing time and the schedule. It is for these “other” players that I feel like PSA helps the most, to identify what non-elite players heading into 2010 have a chance to take the next step, especially around fantasy playoff time. While the schedule is far from the only thing that matters when projecting NFL player performance, it is foolish to suggest that it doesn’t play a significant role.

While pondering each of the factors I have already mentioned in my analysis of a player, I also consider factors such as home vs. away and the likelihood of bad weather games late in the season. In the end, projecting player performance is an art, not a science. There are many different ways to reach the same (or similar) conclusion; I just prefer to show my homework.

Over the next four weeks, I will be posting my game-by-game predictions, two divisions at a time. Bear in mind that while the final numbers are important, they are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. For those unfamiliar with the way I project player stats and individual week-to-week consistency (or for those who need a refresher), please give this article a read for an introductory course in Preseason Schedule Analysis.

Much like any system that projects future performance, each year gives me the opportunity to tweak and hopefully improve the product. After making the ability to personalize each matchup my focus last season, I hope to add volatility to the mix in 2010. By "volatility", I mean: 1) accessing whether my projection represents the ceiling or floor for a given player to operate in this season and 2) understanding that at least one-third of the teams will make a QB change at some point and about the same percentage of NFL starting RBs will not make it through the 16-game schedule (only 19 RBs with more than 100 carries played all 16 games last season). As such, I will judiciously add injury layoffs to players who I feel are significant injury risks.

Before we begin, I feel it necessary to state that my projections are subject to change. Fear not, however, as I will release my final projections and rankings in late August. However, the next few weeks should give all interested parties a pretty good idea of just how strongly I feel about a player's prospects for the upcoming season.

Perhaps more important than the final numbers for each player, though, are the highlighted matchups. Note that I have applied the green highlights (good matchups) to the players who I feel should take advantage of that matchup and the red highlights (bad matchups) to the ones that will be difficult - but not impossible - for that player. Only a handful of defenses merit bad matchups all over the board (the Steelers, Packers, Jets and Bengals all qualify this year), however, just because a player’s box is "red" one week doesn't mean the player won't put up his usual numbers just as a "green" doesn't necessarily mean he will. Furthermore, one WR can have a "red" matchup but the rest of his team could be neutral or green. For instance, when the Jets put CB Darrelle Revis on the opponent's #1 WR, it will qualify as a bad matchup only for the #1 WR, not necessarily for the rest of the passing game. Therefore, a QB, WR or TE will only be considered positive/negative if I don't think he can win his individual matchup.

Before we dive into the projections, let me revisit the volatility I spoke of earlier. In the blue vertical column to the right of my projection, I will place a sign (explained below) as to how much upside or downside a player has this season. Here is the key I will be using over the next four weeks, with no sign by a player’s name suggesting I feel I am projecting the player accurately:

(^) - Projection represents the player’s floor; he has significant upside.
(+) - Projection may be selling the player short; he has some upside.
(-) - Projection may be overselling the player; he is a slight risk.
(!) – Projection represents the player’s ceiling; he is a significant risk.

Note: The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game.

AFC EAST

 Buffalo Bills
  Totals   MIA GB NE NYJ JAX bye BAL KC CHI DET CIN PIT MIN CLE MIA NE
(Run)     7.2 9.4 7.4 9.1 6.7   9.4 6.5 8.3 6.4 8.8 9.3 9.4 7.4 7.2 7.4
(Pass)     8 8.3 7.5 9.7 7.6   7.2 7.2 8.3 5.8 9.1 8.5 8.2 6.7 8 7.5
                                     
Trent Edwards 2850   195 125 180 145 195   205 215 225 265 125 155 230 180 245 165
TD 13   1 0 1 0 1   1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 1
INT 16   0 3 1 1 0   1 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 1
                                     
Fred Jackson 910 + 75 50 45 30 80   40 90 75 105 55 30 40 70 60 65
Ru TD 5   1 0 0 0 1   0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 170   10 0 15 10 5   15 5 15 5 10 0 25 20 15 20
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 25   2 0 2 2 1   2 1 2 1 1 0 4 2 2 3
                                     
CJ Spiller 465   30 20 35 15 50   20 40 25 45 20 15 25 65 25 35
Ru TD 4   0 0 1 0 0   0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 455   45 25 25 15 45   35 25 35 40 20 10 70 10 40 15
Re TD 2   1 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 54   5 1 3 2 6   5 3 4 3 4 2 7 2 5 2
                                     
Marshawn Lynch 265   15 10 10 25 25   15 15 30 10 15 40 10 20 15 10
Ru TD 2   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 80   0 5 0 10 5   5 0 10 0 0 10 5 0 20 10
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 13   0 1 0 2 1   1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 1
                                     
Lee Evans 820   60 30 50 15 70   55 45 80 90 40 65 50 100 25 45
Re TD 4   0 0 0 0 1   0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Rec 52   3 2 4 1 5   5 3 5 4 2 4 4 6 1 3
                                     
Marcus Easley 320   25 20 35 10 35   15 40 0 25 25 15 0 15 40 20
Re TD 2   0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 26   2 1 2 1 2   2 4 0 2 2 1 0 1 4 2
                                     
Steve Johnson 495   35 10 30 30 15   65 55 25 40 0 55 40 25 40 30
Re TD 2   0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 38   3 1 3 2 1   5 4 2 3 0 4 3 2 3 2
                                     
Roscoe Parrish 275   10 15 20 25 0   15 25 45 15 20 0 20 10 45 10
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 28   1 2 2 4 0   2 2 4 1 2 0 2 1 4 1
                                     
Shawn Nelson 235 + 10 20 5 30 20   0 20 15 50 10 0 20 0 20 15
Re TD 3   0 0 1 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 25   1 2 1 4 2   0 3 1 4 1 0 2 0 2 2

Run: New HC Chan Gailey has his work cut out for him, no doubt about it. It’s a good thing that Gailey tends to focus on his offense’s strengths when he calls plays, because the run game is about the only way Buffalo will move the ball with any consistency this year. Assuming Lynch is not traded (which looks to be the case at this moment), the stock of Jackson takes another hit. Spiller figures to play as much receiver as running back and may lead the team in catches, but the team will still find a way to get him 6-8 carries (at least) in just about every game. Throw in a series or two for Lynch each game and there is little chance Jackson will exceed 20 carries very often. As for the schedule, seven of the team’s first 13 games are against defenses I have projected as top-ten rushing defenses. While the RBs are good enough, the Bills’ offensive line is not and given the team’s weak passing attack, defenses will likely stack the line to stop the run and take their chances in single coverage against the likes of Johnson and Easley.

Note: In the event of a Marshawn Lynch trade, feel free to add Lynch’s total onto Jackson’s final numbers. While I’m typically not an advocate of this technique, Gailey will lean on the running game heavily this season whether he has two or three capable RBs. As for Lynch, his upside would undoubtedly soar with less competition and behind a better offensive line.

Pass: In the season’s first four weeks, the Bills face three of the four most aggressive 3-4 defenses and/or coordinators in the NFL (Miami DC Mike Nolan, Green Bay DC Dom Capers, Jets HC Rex Ryan). The other defense Buffalo faces in the first four weeks figures to be run by Bill Belichick. Needless to say, Buffalo’s offense may look even worse than it is already projected to be. The middle of the schedule lets up a bit for the passing game – assuming Edwards can survive behind the Bills’ offensive line that long – but four of the team’s final six games on the fantasy slate come against defenses that should harass the QB all season long in the Bengals, Steelers, Vikings and Dolphins. The only player worth a mention in fantasy from this passing game – Evans – has next to no help at WR or TE and a QB that lacks the arm strength to take advantage of his greatest asset – his speed.

 Miami Dolphins
  Totals   BUF MIN NYJ NE bye GB PIT CIN BAL TEN CHI OAK CLE NYJ BUF DET
(Run)     6.1 9.4 9.1 7.4   9.4 9.3 8.8 9.4 7.8 8.3 8.2 7.4 9.1 6.1 6.4
(Pass)     6.7 8.2 9.7 7.5   8.3 8.5 9.1 7.2 7.5 8.3 8.2 6.7 9.7 6.7 5.8
                                     
Chad Henne 3375   235 245 190 230   220 155 230 275 200 205 215 230 195 245 305
TD 20   2 2 1 0   1 1 1 2 0 2 2 1 0 2 3
INT 12   1 0 1 0   2 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 0
                                     
Pat White 95   0 0 20 0   0 25 0 0 0 0 10 15 0 25 0
TD 2   0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
INT 0   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ru Yards 85   10 0 0 10   0 0 0 0 0 30 0 10 0 10 15
Ru TD 1   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
                                     
Ronnie Brown 500 - 55 45 65 45   35 35 35 50 50 35 50 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Ru TD 7   1 0 2 0   1 0 0 1 2 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Re Yards 80   5 15 0 10   15 0 10 15 0 10 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Rec 9   1 2 0 1   2 0 1 1 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ
                                     
Ricky Williams 1000   65 40 30 65   55 40 55 40 75 55 75 110 65 125 105
Ru TD 10   1 0 0 1   0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 1
Re Yards 270   15 10 30 5   15 10 35 20 10 20 15 20 25 10 30
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 34   2 1 3 1   2 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 4 1 4
                                     
Brandon Marshall 1195   90 115 35 85   55 70 40 140 80 90 45 100 25 85 140
Re TD 9   1 1 0 0   0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Rec 84   7 6 2 5   4 5 3 10 4 7 3 6 3 8 11
                                     
Davone Bess 715   50 60 75 30   65 25 45 60 30 20 70 50 45 60 30
Re TD 2   0 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 66   4 6 6 3   5 4 4 6 3 1 6 5 4 4 5
                                     
Greg Camarillo 355   20 25 40 25   10 0 25 25 0 40 20 25 35 25 40
Re TD 3   0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 33   2 2 4 2   1 0 2 2 0 4 2 2 4 2 4
                                     
Brian Hartline 460   25 0 30 50   30 15 50 15 30 25 35 0 55 50 50
Re TD 4   1 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rec 41   1 0 3 4   4 1 5 1 3 2 3 0 6 3 5
                                     
Anthony Fasano 335   30 20 0 25   30 40 25 0 50 0 40 25 10 25 15
Re TD 4   0 1 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 34   3 2 0 4   4 3 2 1 5 0 3 2 1 2 2

Run: If HC Tony Sparano has taken a close look at the schedule, he’ll realize how quickly it will go from ho-hum to humbling. The first problem with Miami is figuring out where Brown will be in his recovery from his Lisfranc injury last season. The next issue revolves around Williams’ role in the offense – will it be like it was in the first half of last season (as Mr. Outside to Brown’s Mr. Inside) or will the 33-year-old Williams carry the ball more often early to let Brown ease in to his 2009 role? For now, it has to be assumed Brown will not be the explosive back we remember him being until 2011, which should make Williams a hot commodity. Then again, with the ‘Fins’ first-half schedule, it might appear that every RB from Miami is running a bit slow. After the Bills’ game in Week 1, six of the Dolphins’ next seven opponents feature defenses that I believe are among the top seven rushing defenses in the league for the 2010 season. At that point, Miami goes from ridiculously difficult to moderately hard until it wraps up the season against three teams in Weeks 13, 15 and 16 that I consider juicy matchups for a team with the ability to run the ball like Miami can. Since Brown has proven that he is unlikely to hold up over the course of the season, the last quarter of the season looks very tempting for Williams and maybe even someone like Lex Hilliard.

Pass: After a road date in Buffalo, Miami embarks on a six-game stretch in which it must face my top-five projected defenses, with each team being considered an all-around good defense. The sixth opponent over that stretch is the Patriots’ defense, certainly no slouch in their own right. After that long stretch of difficult matchups, Miami may have to face a Baltimore secondary that may be getting healthy, so that might end up being yet another tough contest for the passing game. In fact, it’s not until Week 10-11 that the Dolphins have consecutive non-red matchups, but from Week 10 on, the passing game faces only one team that can be considered a bad matchup for sure right now (Week 14 vs. the Jets). With three of the team’s final four games on the fantasy schedule being against Cleveland, Buffalo and Detroit, savvy fantasy owners may want to trade for the likes of Chad Henne, Brandon Marshall (if he falls a bit short of my expectations through the first half of the season) and even Davone Bess around their fantasy league’s trade deadline because as pivotal December fantasy matchups go, it doesn’t get much better than the Browns, Bills and Lions.

 New England Patriots
  Totals   CIN NYJ BUF MIA bye BAL SD MIN CLE PIT IND DET NYJ CHI GB BUF
(Run)     8.8 9.1 6.1 7.2   9.4 7.2 9.4 7.4 9.3 7.6 6.4 9.1 8.3 9.4 6.1
(Pass)     9.1 9.7 6.7 8   7.2 7.7 8.2 6.7 8.5 8.8 5.8 9.7 8.3 8.3 6.7
                                     
Tom Brady 4130   275 245 350 260   335 280 320 250 275 210 340 225 270 245 250
TD 24   1 0 3 2   2 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1
INT 11   0 2 1 2   0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
                                     
Laurence Maroney 580 40 55 105 30   20 70 35 INJ INJ INJ 65 INJ 80 30 50
Ru TD 4   0 0 1 0   0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ 1 INJ 1 0 0
Re Yards 50   0 10 0 5   0 5 5 INJ INJ INJ 20 INJ 5 0 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 6   0 1 0 1   0 1 1 INJ INJ INJ 1 INJ 1 0 0
                                     
Fred Taylor 315 30 20 25 55   25 INJ INJ INJ INJ 50 25 35 10 15 25
Ru TD 2   1 0 0 0   0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 1 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 30   10 0 0 0   5 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 15 0 0 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0   0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 5   1 0 0 0   1 INJ INJ INJ INJ 1 0 2 0 0 0
                                     
Sammy Morris 475 15 40 25 INJ   30 45 15 100 40 50 15 INJ INJ 40 60
Ru TD 6   0 1 0 INJ   1 1 0 1 0 0 0 INJ INJ 1 1
Re Yards 165   5 15 0 INJ   40 15 10 10 5 15 10 INJ INJ 15 25
Re TD 0   0 0 0 INJ   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0
Rec 25   1 2 0 INJ   4 2 2 1 2 3 2 INJ INJ 2 4
                                     
Kevin Faulk 305   0 10 10 20   0 15 25 45 35 15 20 45 10 10 45
Ru TD 3   0 0 0 1   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 380   20 25 20 25   10 40 55 25 15 20 25 15 35 20 30
Re TD 2   0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 49   3 4 2 3   2 4 5 3 2 3 4 2 5 3 4
                                     
Randy Moss 1225   65 25 125 70   110 90 130 75 80 85 125 20 110 60 55
Re TD 10   1 0 2 0   1 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0
Rec 80   5 2 6 5   8 4 7 5 5 8 8 2 6 5 4
                                     
Wes Welker 735 - 35 35 50 30   50 40 INJ INJ 85 65 55 85 70 75 60
Re TD 3   0 0 0 0   1 0 INJ INJ 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 62   3 2 3 3   5 3 INJ INJ 7 6 5 8 6 6 5
                                     
Julian Edelman 760 + 75 60 75 50   40 25 90 105 35 25 25 65 30 40 20
Re TD 3   0 0 1 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 73   8 6 7 6   4 2 9 11 3 3 2 4 3 3 2
Brandon Tate/                                    
Torry Holt 395   45 30 45 25   55 30 10 20 25 0 45 15 0 20 30
Re TD 2   0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 25   3 3 2 2   3 1 1 2 1 0 3 1 0 1 2
                                     
Alge Crumpler 70   0 10 0 10   5 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 20 0 15
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 10   0 2 0 1   1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2
Rob Gronkowski/                                    
Aaron Hernandez 320   20 35 35 45   20 35 20 15 20 0 35 10 0 15 15
Re TD 3   0 0 0 1   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 32   2 2 3 5   3 4 2 1 2 0 4 1 0 2 1

Run: Year after year, the Patriots pass on bringing in a top-end prospect at RB, instead opting to stick with the over-30 crowd (Taylor, Faulk, Morris) and a former first-rounder who has yet to match the bar he set as a rookie (Maroney). Since only Faulk can be considered a good bet to stay healthy all season long, the fun begins when injuries strike. Fortunately or unfortunately, the Patriots have finished in the top half of the league each season since 2004 in the top half of RB fantasy points scored (all but twice ending the season in the top 10). Much like the rest of the AFC East, New England figures to be thrown about every tough run defense imaginable, courtesy of the AFC and NFC North opponents. Perhaps the most amazing thing about the 2010 schedule is the way it is spread out; outside of Weeks 3-4, it doesn’t appear as if the Pats will have much of a chance to build momentum. And since the Patriots’ backfield is so based on injury statuses and game-by-game situational production, it’s probably a safe bet that no single New England RB will end 2010 in the top 30 at his position in fantasy (unless someone can stay healthy all 16 games).

Pass: To what degree Welker is able to return will likely determine just how much of a bargain owning Brady will be this season. For the purposes of this article, I will take the less optimistic approach to his recovery and suggest he will be very fortunate to start the season on time (although I do forecast he will gain some measure of his trademark explosiveness as the season goes on). After facing the two teams I feel have the two most talented pass defenses in the league to start the season, New England could enjoy a nice stretch against a few pass defenses that should be overmatched, such as Buffalo, Baltimore (likely without Ed Reed), San Diego and Cleveland. (Therefore, for those looking for a discounted rate on Brady, Moss, Welker or possibly Edelman, it would be after Week 2.) Unfortunately, the schedule difficulty picks back up in Week 10 at Pittsburgh and is followed by the always-entertaining rivalry with Indianapolis the following week. The schedule-makers also did the Patriots’ passing game no favors this season when it came to putting the team in favorable situations at fantasy playoff time. In Weeks 13 and 15, they play two of the stoutest pass defenses at home (Jets, Packers). In Weeks 14 and 16, they take the road in contests where the elements (snow, wind, etc) could easily make a difference in the play-calling that day.

 New York Jets
  Totals   BAL NE MIA BUF MIN DEN bye GB DET CLE HOU CIN NE MIA PIT CHI
(Run)     9.4 7.4 7.2 6.1 9.4 7.1   9.4 6.4 7.4 7.8 8.8 7.4 7.2 9.3 8.3
(Pass)     7.2 7.5 8 6.7 8.2 8.1   8.3 5.8 6.7 7.5 9.1 7.5 8 8.5 8.3
                                     
Mark Sanchez 3195   220 185 155 185 260 225   210 270 210 240 175 195 255 175 235
TD 19   2 1 0 0 1 1   1 3 0 2 1 1 2 2 2
INT 15   0 1 2 0 3 0   1 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 1
                                     
Shonn Greene 970 ^ 65 105 80 130 40 80   35 INJ INJ INJ 70 85 100 70 110
Ru TD 11   0 1 1 2 0 1   1 INJ INJ INJ 1 1 2 0 1
Re Yards 40   0 5 0 0 10 0   5 INJ INJ INJ 0 5 15 0 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0 0   0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 7   0 1 0 0 1 0   2 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 2 0 0
                                     
L Tomlinson 610 - 30 35 40 40 25 30   50 85 105 60 30 INJ 35 15 30
Ru TD 5   0 0 1 1 0 0   0 1 2 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Re Yards 195   20 10 25 10 35 0   20 0 0 20 10 INJ 20 10 15
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 27   3 2 3 1 3 0   3 0 1 3 2 INJ 3 1 2
                                     
Joe McKnight 295   15 0 25 40 35 10   20 30 45 15 10 40 10 INJ INJ
Ru TD 2   0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ
Re Yards 190   10 0 15 10 15 5   10 50 25 10 0 25 15 INJ INJ
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ
Rec 19   1 0 1 2 2 1   1 3 3 1 0 3 1 INJ INJ
                                     
Jerricho Cotchery 930   60 75 50 65 40 80   65 85 40 60 45 90 65 35 75
Re TD 6   0 1 0 0 0 1   0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
Rec 74   4 6 4 6 3 7   6 5 4 5 3 6 5 2 8
                                     
Santonio Holmes 720   SUS SUS SUS SUS 80 55   50 100 55 85 45 50 35 110 55
Re TD 5   SUS SUS SUS SUS 1 0   0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Rec 46   SUS SUS SUS SUS 6 4   3 6 4 6 2 4 2 6 3
                                     
Braylon Edwards 515   75 30 30 80 25 45   25 10 35 45 20 0 40 0 55
Re TD 3   1 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 26   3 2 3 4 1 2   1 1 2 2 1 0 2 0 2
                                     
Dustin Keller 605   55 65 35 20 55 40   35 25 55 20 55 25 65 20 35
Re TD 4   1 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Rec 53   5 6 3 2 4 5   3 2 5 2 4 2 6 1 3

Run: New York got off a bit lucky during the 2009 season when it came to playing against some weak run defenses, facing some of the more questionable run-stopping teams in the league – their own division as well as the AFC and NFC South. (Take a look here to see what I thought about their schedule last season.) This time around, the more potent AFC and NFC North rush defenses await the Jets. Combine that with the abbreviated season we saw from Greene (due to ankle and rib injuries) last year and it should make us pause a bit before we praise the second-year RB from Iowa. The Jets kick off the season against an elite run defense in the Ravens before closing out the first quarter of the season with a couple of neutral games and a juicy matchup vs. Buffalo. Two of the next three contests see New York host stout run defenses in the Vikings and Packers. The Jets then get two of their most fantasy-friendly contests of the season in consecutive road games against the Lions and Browns. Although the quality of (and commitment to) the ground game will get them through the last third of the season, there is nothing easy about the final 5-6 games. Cincinnati (Week 12) and Pittsburgh (Week 15) will be difficult for the Jets, especially if both defenses are healthy at that point of the season. Additionally, Mike Nolan’s Dolphins defense (Week 14) and the Bears (Week 16) should be above-average vs. the run as well.

Note: I have Greene missing three pretty solid matchups due to injury in the middle of the season. Please feel free to add at least 250 rushing yards and three scores to his projection if you believe he will hold up all season long. Thus, Greene is a solid bet for 1300-1400 rushing yards and 12-14 TDs if he can stay healthy.

Pass: Although they will remain a running team, the Jets have promised to throw the ball a bit more in 2010. Judging by the amount of red on their schedule above, they’ll need Sanchez to go skip the sophomore slump and Holmes to emerge as a consistent playmaking force once he returns from his suspension. While the first quarter of the fantasy season is harmless enough, Week 5 begins a brutal season-long stretch against some top-notch secondaries and/or tough Cover 2 defenses. In successive weeks (with a bye sandwiched in between), the Jets face the likes of Antoine Winfield, Champ Bailey and Charles Woodson. After getting a short reprieve in Detroit and Cleveland, New York encounters two of the best young secondaries in the league (Cincinnati, Miami) and what should be two of the fiercest pass-rushing defenses (Pittsburgh, Chicago) over the final five weeks of the fantasy season. The Jets have enough playmakers for Sanchez to improve his woeful 12:20 TD-to-INT ratio from a season ago, but whether he takes the next step or not in his second season greatly depends on his own work habits and the health of the defenses he faces this season.

AFC NORTH

 Baltimore Ravens
  Totals   NYJ CIN CLE PIT DEN NE BUF bye MIA ATL CAR TB PIT HOU NO CLE
(Run)     9.1 8.8 7.4 9.3 7.1 7.4 6.1   7.2 6.6 5.8 6.2 9.3 7.8 7.4 7.4
(Pass)     9.7 9.1 6.7 8.5 8.1 7.5 6.7   8 7.7 7.1 6.4 8.5 7.5 7.8 6.7
Joe Flacco 3520 + 185 230 285 185 260 280 210   205 250 210 285 230 290 225 190
TD 22   1 1 2 0 2 2 2   0 2 2 2 1 3 1 1
INT 12   2 1 0 0 1 0 1   1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0
                                     
Ray Rice 1440   55 65 90 60 100 110 140   60 125 150 115 40 80 115 135
Ru TD 11   0 0 1 0 1 1 2   0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2
Re Yards 560   25 40 40 20 35 25 20   85 25 40 50 35 75 25 20
Re TD 2   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Rec 60   3 3 5 2 4 4 2   10 3 5 6 4 4 3 2
                                     
Willis McGahee 445 - 15 25 40 15 25 45 50   35 15 50 30 15 25 15 45
Ru TD 6   1 1 0 0 0 1 0   2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 65   10 10 5 0 5 0 0   0 10 0 10 5 0 10 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 8   1 1 1 0 1 0 0   0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
                                     
Le'Ron McClain 160   5 5 15 0 10 5 25   0 10 15 10 5 15 10 30
Ru TD 3   0 0 1 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 125   15 5 0 0 5 10 25   10 5 0 15 0 10 5 20
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 16   2 1 0 0 1 1 2   1 1 0 2 0 1 1 3
                                     
Anquan Boldin 1045   25 90 110 60 75 110 INJ   INJ 90 50 70 125 100 80 60
Re TD 9   0 1 1 0 1 1 INJ   INJ 1 0 0 1 2 1 0
Rec 78   3 6 5 5 6 8 INJ   INJ 8 4 5 10 7 6 5
                                     
Derrick Mason 1030   60 50 90 70 100 50 90   55 70 65 85 50 65 55 75
Re TD 6   0 0 1 0 1 0 1   0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Rec 76   4 3 6 5 6 4 7   4 6 7 5 3 6 4 6
                                     
Donte Stallworth 375   15 25 50 20 INJ INJ INJ   70 20 0 35 20 40 55 25
Re TD 2   0 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 17   1 1 2 1 INJ INJ INJ   3 1 0 1 1 2 3 1
                                     
Mark Clayton 230   15 10 25 0 20 45 30   25 0 15 10 INJ 10 25 0
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 21   1 1 2 0 2 4 3   2 0 2 1 INJ 1 2 0
                                     
Todd Heap 465 - 35 25 15 35 20 40 45   30 50 40 45 15 30 25 15
Re TD 4   1 0 0 0 0 0 1   0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 43   3 3 1 4 2 3 5   3 4 4 5 1 2 2 1

Run: The Jets, Bengals and Steelers (Weeks 1, 2 and 4, respectively) will offer up the most resistance the Ravens’ running game should figure on seeing the entire season. It’s also worth mentioning here that OC Cam Cameron has a tendency to share the running game load over the first quarter of the season, so it may all be for the best for Rice long-term. From Week 5 on, the Ravens see just one defense I would consider a top-level run-stopping unit (Steelers in Week 13), which may allow Rice to fulfill the very lofty 15-game numbers I believe he will achieve this season. Much like Chris Johnson did with LenDale White in 2009, I believe Rice will make McGahee obsolete in the Baltimore offense as we move into October. But the best part of owning Rice this season may not even be that – it could easily be how ridiculous his total-yardage numbers are from Week 10 on when Baltimore should have its way on the ground against all the NFC South teams and Cleveland. I predicted earlier this summer that I felt Rice could score double-digit TDs this season and I feel even stronger about that prediction now.

Pass: For a QB who may be on his way to competing for a Pro Bowl selection, Flacco is going to have his work cut out for himself early, going against the two units I feel possess the strongest pass defenses in the league in the Jets and Bengals. Cleveland should provide a brief respite, but then a road game at Pittsburgh comes next. After that, the schedule eases up considerably, although it will be hard for Cameron not to run the ball all day with Rice when the likes of Buffalo, Atlanta, Tampa Bay and Carolina are the opponents. Regardless, after the first quarter of the season (which would be a good time to acquire Flacco, Boldin and Mason), Baltimore should benefit from its schedule as only Pittsburgh and New Orleans strike me as defenses that may upset the Ravens’ offensive rhythm. Boldin will face his fair share of above-average CBs (which explains the lack of green on his chart), but the biggest worry for him each season is injuries, not opposing CBs. Only Darrelle Revis (Week 1) and possibly Champ Bailey (if new Broncos DC Don Martindale opts to have his top corner shadow the opponent’s WR1) strike me as players who can reasonably contain Boldin. Mason, on the other hand, will go from being the focal point of the secondary’s game plan to the second option. Only the Jets, Cincinnati and Miami should have enough good DBs to keep up with him, so expect 70-catch, 900-1000 yard season from him again in 2010.

 Cincinnati Bengals
  Totals   NE BAL CAR CLE TB bye ATL MIA PIT IND BUF NYJ NO PIT CLE SD
(Run)     7.4 9.4 5.8 7.4 6.2   6.6 7.2 9.3 7.6 6.1 9.1 7.4 9.3 7.4 7.2
(Pass)     7.5 7.2 7.1 6.7 6.4   7.7 8 8.5 8.8 6.7 9.7 7.8 8.5 6.7 7.7
                                     
Carson Palmer 3525   235 275 155 220 255 0 325 220 200 240 225 140 290 195 260 290
TD 24   1 2 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 3 0 2 1 2 3
INT 13   1 0 1 2 0   0 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 1
                                     
Cedric Benson 1230 - 90 75 115 100 135   80 65 INJ 100 110 85 INJ 60 125 90
Ru TD 8   0 0 2 1 1   0 0 INJ 1 1 1 INJ 0 1 0
Re Yards 100   5 20 0 5 10   10 15 INJ 5 0 10 INJ 5 5 10
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 INJ 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 17   1 3 0 1 2   1 2 INJ 1 0 2 INJ 1 1 2
                                     
Bernard Scott 510   25 15 55 30 20   10 50 30 35 35 INJ 110 20 45 30
Ru TD 3   0 0 1 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 INJ 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 250   10 0 10 15 20   25 15 15 40 25 INJ 35 10 20 10
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 28   1 0 1 2 2   2 1 2 3 2 INJ 4 2 3 3
                                     
Brian Leonard 105   0 5 10 10 15   0 10 10 0 10 10 15 5 0 5
Ru TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 125   10 5 0 10 5   15 25 10 0 15 15 5 5 0 5
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 21   2 1 0 2 1   2 3 2 0 3 2 1 1 0 1
                                     
Chad Ochocinco 1005   50 100 40 55 90   90 35 65 40 65 20 120 45 75 115
Re TD 8   0 1 0 1 1   0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
Rec 74   4 6 3 4 8   5 3 6 3 6 2 8 4 5 7
                                     
Antonio Bryant 725 ! 75 55 25 65 INJ   90 50 35 55 60 55 INJ 55 55 50
Re TD 5   1 0 0 1 INJ   1 0 0 0 1 0 INJ 0 1 0
Rec 51   5 4 2 4 INJ   6 4 1 3 5 5 INJ 3 6 3
                                     
Jordan Shipley 440   30 20 40 15 65   25 35 20 10 25 25 30 35 45 20
Re TD 2   0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 40   2 2 3 1 5   2 3 3 1 4 3 3 2 4 2
                                     
Andre Caldwell 420   35 45 20 25 20   35 20 45 40 20 0 60 35 15 5
Re TD 3   0 1 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 34   3 3 2 2 2   3 1 4 4 2 0 4 2 1 1
                                     
Jermaine Gresham 460   20 30 20 30 45   35 25 10 50 15 15 40 5 45 75
Re TD 5   0 0 0 0 1   0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 38   1 3 1 3 4   3 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 4 6

Run: One of the wonderful developments of commissioner Roger Goodell’s edict to have each team play a divisional game in Week 17 meant some team in the AFC North would put off playing Baltimore or Pittsburgh until the week after most fantasy leagues are decided. What this means is one less stout run defense for Benson owners to worry about in 2010. In fact, according to the defensive grades I handed out last week, Cincinnati faces the second-easiest run fantasy schedule (behind Baltimore) of the eight teams I will cover this week. After a difficult start to the season in Foxboro and at home vs. the Ravens, savvy fantasy owners without Benson on their roster may want to acquire him as the Bengals should have ample opportunity to ride their bellcow as long as they want to with four straight games against what should be some of the worst run defenses in the league. Miami and Pittsburgh figure to slow him down considerably, but the run defenses of the Colts and Bills should serve allow for a rebound. Weeks 12-14 (against the Jets, Saints and Steelers) may yield only one decent running performance from the Bengals, but Benson – if healthy – should serve his owners well in Weeks 15 and 16 when he faces Cleveland and San Diego in consecutive home games to close out the fantasy season. Not only do both teams figure to be mediocre at stopping the run, Benson did most of his damage at home last season (106 yards rushing/game, 5 TDs in seven games).

Pass: There’s no question the fantasy football projection business is a constantly evolving one – and the Bengals certainly do their part to make it that much more challenging. As of press time, Cincinnati appears to closing in on Terrell Owens. While we all understand his arrival isn’t as buzz-worthy as it used to be, it does have a couple of fantasy implications if he does sign: 1) Antonio Bryant’s knee isn’t healthy and the team feels he won’t be useful this season and 2) the Bengals won’t as run-heavy as they would have been with Bryant, who is a more physical receiver and blocker than Owens. This would obviously make Palmer all that much more valuable because a healthy Owens would likely perform at least to the level of the Bryant projection I have below. And Cincinnati could not really have asked for much more in terms of a first-half passing schedule. While the first six games present some challenges (Bill Belichick’s defensive prowess should never been underestimated and Carolina as well as Tampa Bay have talent in the secondary), not a single one of those teams possess the total package of superior talent, scheme and coaching. Weeks 8-10 present the Bengals with their first real challenges of the season with Miami, Pittsburgh and Indianapolis. Cincinnati gets a one-week breather vs. Buffalo (a game in which it may decide to run the ball all day) before it faces a nightmare matchup with the Jets in Week 12. From that point on, only Pittsburgh stands out as a team that should bottle up the Bengals’ pass game, with home matchups against Cleveland and San Diego in Weeks 15 and 16 as plus-matchups against teams that feature poor safety play.

 Cleveland Browns
  Totals   TB KC BAL CIN ATL PIT NO bye NE NYJ JAX CAR MIA BUF CIN BAL
(Run)     6.2 6.5 9.4 8.8 6.6 9.3 7.4   7.4 9.1 6.7 5.8 7.2 6.1 8.8 9.4
(Pass)     6.4 7.2 7.2 9.1 7.7 8.5 7.8   7.5 9.7 7.6 7.1 8 6.7 9.1 7.2
                                     
Jake Delhomme 1960 ! 185 165 220 170 165 65 230   165 70 195 140 190 0 0 0
TD 12   1 1 2 0 0 1 2   1 0 2 1 1 0 0 0
INT 15   0 1 2 1 0 3 1   0 3 0 2 2 0 0 0
                                     
Seneca Wallace 265   0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 0
TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INT 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ru Yards 45   0 0 10 0 0 15 0   0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0
Ru TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
                                     
Colt McCoy 550   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 185 195
TD 2   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
INT 2   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
                                     
Montario Hardesty 870 - 80 90 35 45 70 45 55   70 INJ INJ 110 55 100 65 50
Ru TD 4   0 1 0 0 1 0 0   0 INJ INJ 1 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 70   10 0 10 5 10 15 5   0 INJ INJ 0 10 0 5 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 10   1 0 2 1 1 2 1   0 INJ INJ 0 1 0 1 0
                                     
Jerome Harrison 495 + 35 35 35 20 45 15 25   25 45 85 15 40 20 35 20
Ru TD 4   0 0 1 0 1 0 0   0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 310   20 15 20 15 25 10 45   15 20 30 0 15 35 20 25
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 44   3 2 4 3 4 1 4   2 3 4 0 2 5 3 4
                                     
Joshua Cribbs 360 + 15 40 10 20 40 10 20   35 0 60 45 15 25 0 25
Ru TD 2   0 1 0 0 1 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 490   35 25 45 10 20 45 25   35 25 20 55 40 10 55 45
Re TD 3   0 0 1 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 37   2 2 3 1 2 3 2   4 1 2 4 3 1 4 3
                                     
Mohamad Massaquoi 745   45 35 85 55 40 45 70   35 0 55 35 55 35 70 85
Re TD 4   0 0 1 0 0 0 1   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 56   4 2 6 3 4 3 5   4 0 5 2 4 2 6 6
                                     
Brian Robiskie 515   40 50 25 40 15 35 15   50 75 30 25 25 35 15 40
Re TD 2   0 1 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 40   3 4 2 3 1 2 1   5 5 3 2 2 3 1 3
                                     
Bobby Engram 230   0 15 20 15 30 25 35   10 45 20 15 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ
Rec 22   0 1 2 2 3 2 4   1 4 2 1 INJ INJ INJ INJ
                                     
Ben Watson 405   35 25 15 30 25 40 35   20 10 40 10 45 55 20 0
Re TD 4   1 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 34   3 2 1 3 2 3 2   2 1 5 1 3 4 2 0

Run: Cleveland has the unfortunate task of trying to rebuild in a division that is known for strong running games and strong run defenses. For the longest time, that meant four games each year vs. the Steelers and the Ravens with the Bengals offering the Browns a chance to build some rhythm on offense. That no longer appears to be the case as Cincinnati has joined Baltimore and Pittsburgh in the upper echelon of defenses, which means before we even start the analysis of the Browns’ run schedule, one-third of the 15 games are red matchups. Thankfully, Cleveland gets a soft run schedule to open the season with Tampa Bay and Kansas City in Weeks 1 and 2. Naturally, three of the next four games are in the division, which makes it all the more important that Hardesty take advantage of the four less imposing pre-bye games. After the Week 8 bye, Hardesty (and possibly Harrison) will get their shots at some average run-stopping units with only the Jets in Week 10 a nightmare matchup. But for as juicy as a Week 14 game against Buffalo is for those owners who start their fantasy playoffs that week, Weeks 15 and 16 should force Hardesty and Harrison owners to look for other options as Cincinnati and Baltimore will close out the fantasy season. If Hardesty wasn’t being viewed as a mid-range RB3 before, he should be now.

Pass: In Carolina, fantasy owners got used to seeing Delhomme force the ball into Steve Smith. In recent years, the Panthers’ ground game became so proficient that it could overcome a number of the QB’s gaffes. In Cleveland, Delhomme does not have any RB in the neighborhood of Jonathan Stewart or DeAngelo Williams, nor does he have a WR that can emulate Smith. If the people reading this article believe this situation spells disaster, I agree. Given the embryonic stage of the Browns’ passing game, it’s hard to give any of the players a green for the simple fact that Cleveland would probably rather run the ball at this point in time. Delhomme is one of the handful of QBs most likely to get pulled from games (or the lineup) for poor play this season and, even in the best-case scenario, only Massaquoi and Cribbs figure to have much relevance in fantasy. From a matchup standpoint, Weeks 1, 2, 5 and 14 offer some hope for owners who may desperate for a WR3 candidate, but outside of that, leave all Browns’ passing game members out of your lineup.

 Pittsburgh Steelers
  Totals   ATL TEN TB BAL bye CLE MIA NO CIN NE OAK BUF BAL CIN NYJ CAR
(Run)     6.6 7.8 6.2 9.4   7.4 7.2 7.4 8.8 7.4 8.2 6.1 9.4 8.8 9.1 5.8
(Pass)     7.7 7.5 6.4 7.2   6.7 8 7.8 9.1 7.5 8.2 6.7 7.2 9.1 9.7 7.1
                                     
Ben Roethlisberger 1955   SUS SUS SUS SUS   SUS SUS 210 205 265 210 205 255 225 145 235
TD 14   SUS SUS SUS SUS   SUS SUS 2 0 3 2 1 2 1 1 2
INT 8   SUS SUS SUS SUS   SUS SUS 1 2 0 1 0 1 2 1 0
Ru Yards 70   SUS SUS SUS SUS   SUS SUS 15 10 5 5 10 15 10 0 0
Ru TD 2   SUS SUS SUS SUS   SUS SUS 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
                                     
Byron Leftwich 1365   245 250 195 240   265 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TD 9   2 2 3 1   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INT 7   2 1 0 1   1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
                                     
Rashard Mendenhall 1205 - 75 60 115 40   90 80 70 50 105 75 140 55 70 55 125
Ru TD 7   0 0 1 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2
Re Yards 215   15 25 0 10   25 5 20 35 15 5 0 20 25 5 10
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 28   2 3 0 2   2 1 3 4 2 1 0 3 2 1 2
                                     
Jonathan Dwyer 265 + 20 15 15 25   35 10 15 20 15 10 25 10 15 10 25
Ru TD 6   1 0 1 0   1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 25   0 5 0 0   0 0 5 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 0
Re TD 0   0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 4   0 1 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
                                     
Hines Ward 1000   65 55 80 65   100 55 40 75 65 45 100 95 65 15 80
Re TD 9   1 0 1 1   1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
Rec 81   5 5 6 5   8 4 3 7 6 4 7 8 5 2 6
                                     
Mike Wallace 1055 + 85 75 65 90   60 40 80 45 100 80 55 105 65 60 50
Re TD 6   1 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 70   5 4 3 5   3 4 5 3 7 6 5 8 3 5 4
Emmanuel Sanders/                                    
Antwaan Randle El 445   40 35 15 15   45 30 50 25 40 35 20 0 40 20 35
Re TD 1   0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 30   3 2 1 3   3 2 3 2 2 3 1 0 1 2 2
                                     
Heath Miller 580   40 55 35 60   35 40 15 25 45 35 30 35 25 45 60
Re TD 6   0 2 1 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
Rec 54   3 6 3 5   4 5 2 3 5 2 2 3 2 3 6

Run: The conventional wisdom is that Pittsburgh will return back to its running roots this season, but OC Bruce Arians is not exactly a conventional play-caller or someone who has a history of calling more runs than passes (his teams have passed more often in five of his six years as a NFL play-caller). However, Mendenhall’s biggest concern right now is keeping a hold of the short-yardage duties because he will run enough to be very productive in fantasy from a yardage perspective. Much like the passing game (detailed below), the running game gets off fairly easy in the weeks Roethlisberger will miss, with only Baltimore standing out as a difficult run defense. In fact, the schedule shows only one top-tier run defense in the first half of the season, so if Pittsburgh hasn’t made a solid short-yardage choice by Week 1, it’s possible Mendenhall will have wrapped it up in time for a more difficult second-half slate. In addition to Cincinnati (Week 9), the Steelers face off against what should be capable run defenses in New England and Oakland. Only Buffalo’s defense should give a breather to the Pittsburgh running game that closes with a ridiculously difficult run schedule in Weeks 13-15 (Baltimore, Cincinnati, NY Jets), making Mendenhall much less attractive to own at fantasy playoff time.

Pass: In what figures to be a six-game audition for Leftwich, he’ll get every opportunity to show his wares with a pretty strong receiving crew. Amazingly, Miami may offer the most resistance to the Steelers in what figures to be Leftwich’s last start. Of course, there is usually a price to pay when a team gets that much help from the schedule early on; when Big Ben returns, his first game will be on the road against the blitz-happy, turnover-forcing Saints defense. After another road game vs. a stout Bengals’ squad, Bill Belichick’s New England team figures to be yet another difficult challenge. In fact, only a Week 12 matchup in Buffalo figures to be a game in which the Steelers can flex their passing muscles. The fantasy playoffs are far from easy as well, offering up the two teams I feel have the best secondaries in the league this season – the Jets and Bengals – in Weeks 14 and 15. The Panthers are no slouch in the secondary either, but the run defense should be dreadful enough to the point that Pittsburgh will focus its gameplan around the ground game that day. While Hines Ward should turn in yet another 80-catch, 1,000-yard season, look out for Mike Wallace. He’s no Santonio Holmes, but the schedule doesn’t offer up a lot in the way of defenses that feature two high-quality CBs or top-notch safeties. Since Wallace possess elite deep speed, Pittsburgh would be wise to take regular shots down the field.

Suggestions, comments, musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail me.