A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Along with excitement that football is near, the first week of
training camp usually brings about its share of injuries –
most of which only seem to be of the season-ending variety. Last
year, Jeremy Maclin and Dennis Pitta were among the first notable
players to go down. This year hasn’t claimed any big names
yet, but the season-ending injuries to Vick Ballard and Kendall
Hunter should serve as a pretty good reminder that no team –
fantasy or real – is ever too deep. A couple of months ago,
the San Francisco 49ers appeared to have five potentially capable
running backs fighting for four spots. Now, they have an aging
vet (Frank Gore), a second-round rookie that never made it through
a full season in college (Carlos Hyde) and a back in Marcus Lattimore
that is still being treated with kid gloves and has admitted he
needs to cross a mental hurdle nearly two years after his horrific
college knee injury.
Season-ending injuries at any time of the year are unfortunate.
However, if they are going to happen, fantasy owners should be
thankful for the ones that happen now as opposed to Week 1 or
Week 2. Ballard and Hunter’s absences aren’t going
to be felt nearly as much as Maclin and Pitta’s were last
year, but don’t think for a second that another one (or
handful) isn’t/aren’t coming in the next few weeks.
For all the safety measures that have been instituted into football
in recent years, it is still a violent and cruel sport. Just like
the real game, the fantasy teams and owners that find themselves
playing for something at the end of the season typically are the
ones that either avoided key injuries and/or handled adversity
the best.
Two weeks ago, I kicked
off my sixth year of projecting each player on every team game-by-game,
two divisions at a time. Last
week, I provided a look inside the AFC and NFC North. This
week, we’ll dive inside the AFC and NFC South.
Here’s a quick explanation of what each of the colors mean
in each team’s projection chart below:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
White – Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.
For an example as to the amount of possibilities and factors
I consider, take a look below at the Indianapolis Colts’
projections. T.Y. Hilton does not have a single “red”
on his schedule because: 1) there is a lack of upper-echelon cornerbacks
on his schedule and 2) most of the top cornerbacks he could face
in a given week – such as Denver’s Aqib Talib or Cleveland’s
Joe Haden – will either guard Reggie Wayne or not follow
Hilton when he moves into the slot. In other cases (which I will
discuss as we move along with these projections), players such
as Philadelphia’s Brandon Boykin can get exposed if they
play anywhere but the slot. Most receivers see a lot of time on
both sides of the formation (left and right) while the majority
of today’s cornerbacks remain on one side. And really, that
is just the tip of the iceberg when I hammer out these projections.
As you can tell, a lot of thought goes into this.
Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see
below in the tables:
Notes:
- The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects
a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks
of the season. Black boxes represent bye weeks.
- These are my initial projections and therefore subject
to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes
may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a
player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong
preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection
and the removal of another.
- For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately
to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game
totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title
game. Additionally, players with fewer than 10 projected catches
or 100 projected yards have been removed, which will explain
the discrepancy in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
- The age you see by each player will be that player’s
age as of September 1, 2014.
Key to the table below:
PPR Avg - Points per
game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth
six points.
NPPR Avg - Points per game in non-PPR
leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in
non-PPR.
AFC South
Houston Texans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAS |
OAK |
NYG |
BUF |
DAL |
IND |
PIT |
TEN |
PHI |
bye |
CLE |
CIN |
TEN |
JAC |
IND |
BAL |
QB |
Ryan Fitzpatrick |
31 |
17.9 |
17.9 |
251.1 |
251.1 |
3465 |
|
250 |
255 |
240 |
305 |
320 |
255 |
185 |
225 |
345 |
|
210 |
275 |
285 |
255 |
60 |
INJ |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
INJ |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
30 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
25 |
|
10 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Tom Savage |
24 |
15 |
15 |
29.9 |
29.9 |
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
225 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Arian Foster |
28 |
18.7 |
14.7 |
281 |
220 |
1185 |
|
80 |
115 |
70 |
55 |
120 |
70 |
60 |
75 |
60 |
|
85 |
75 |
110 |
65 |
85 |
60 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
475 |
|
30 |
20 |
35 |
25 |
50 |
40 |
15 |
25 |
70 |
|
10 |
35 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
|
2 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Andre Brown |
27 |
3.8 |
3.4 |
56.5 |
50.5 |
280 |
|
20 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
25 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
|
15 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
30 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Andre Johnson |
33 |
16.6 |
10.5 |
249.5 |
157.5 |
1275 |
|
80 |
80 |
70 |
85 |
115 |
70 |
80 |
75 |
130 |
|
55 |
80 |
125 |
115 |
60 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
6 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
|
5 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
DeAndre Hopkins |
22 |
12.6 |
8.4 |
188.5 |
126.5 |
905 |
|
65 |
75 |
50 |
90 |
65 |
50 |
40 |
55 |
65 |
|
60 |
105 |
50 |
20 |
75 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
5 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Thomas |
27 |
3.1 |
1.6 |
46 |
24 |
240 |
|
20 |
0 |
5 |
30 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
35 |
|
10 |
0 |
35 |
10 |
20 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
DeVier Posey |
24 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
23 |
12 |
120 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Garrett Graham |
28 |
8.7 |
5.5 |
104.5 |
65.5 |
415 |
|
30 |
35 |
45 |
55 |
15 |
20 |
INJ |
40 |
10 |
|
35 |
INJ |
INJ |
45 |
35 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
INJ |
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
C.J. Fiedorowicz |
22 |
7 |
4.6 |
104.5 |
68.5 |
445 |
|
25 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
40 |
25 |
45 |
0 |
35 |
|
25 |
30 |
55 |
30 |
20 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
General overview: Questions abound
at just about every skill position in Houston. On the surface, the
Texans have one of the worst quarterback situations in the league.
Or do they? Fitzpatrick is a notorious fast starter with a better
supporting cast than he has probably ever had. For years, the cold
and windy Buffalo winters received the blame for his second-half
letdowns. This season, the Ivy League gunslinger’s last outdoor/non-warm
weather game during the fantasy season figures to be in Cleveland
in Week 11. Fitzpatrick is far from the only question mark in Houston,
however, as the offense figures to revolve around Foster, but is
he going to be healthy enough to carry it? New HC Bill O’Brien
has already stated that he sees the injury-prone Brown as a two-down
back only, so if Foster is truly in the decline phase portion of
his career already and/or suffers another long-term injury, then
Houston is in trouble. The other major question mark: how quickly
Johnson will acclimate himself to O’Brien’s playbook
after missing OTAs? Fitzpatrick reportedly became fast on-field
friends with Hopkins during offseason practices, so is this the
year in which Johnson begins to drop off from the 80-100 catch wideout
we have come to know and love? At tight end, Graham will immerse
himself into the “F” role (Aaron Hernandez’s old
spot with O’Brien’s Patriots earlier in this decade)
while Ryan Griffin and Fiedorowicz battle it out at “Y”
(Rob Gronkowski’s position). None of the Texans’ options
are as talented as New England’s, so who wins out between
Griffin and Fiedorowicz and will it matter in fantasy? Matchup
analysis: If the extra time he had off last season proves
to be helpful to his body, then Foster has a wonderful opportunity
to enjoy the kind of season that made him a fantasy superstar
since his 2010 breakout. Most of the best run defenses he figures
to face are from the AFC North, although only Baltimore (Week
16) has a great chance to be among the best in the league. However,
one poorly-placed matchup in the fantasy title game shouldn’t
be enough to keep owners from investing into him as a RB2 because
whatever ills his improved offensive line doesn’t cure,
volume should. O’Brien has already suggested Foster will
also fill the Kevin Faulk and Danny Woodhead role in his offense
as well, meaning the soon-to-be sixth-year veteran’s only
roadblock to another huge fantasy season is his ability to carry
another massive workload. The story is very much the same for
Johnson and Hopkins, who both have exceedingly smooth schedules
in the first half of the season as only the Giants’ much-improved
secondary in Week 3 can really match up to them talent-wise. Johnson
will also get challenged by Buffalo’s Stephon Gilmore (Week
4), Haden in Week 11 and perhaps Indianapolis’ Vontae Davis
(on occasion) in Weeks 6 and 15, but all are battles he is more
than capable of winning. Hopkins probably has it even easier,
with Pittsburgh’s Cortez Allen (Week 7) possibly the best
cornerback he will see outside of the Giants’ Prince Amukamara
(Week 3) in the first half of the season. Cleveland (Week 11),
Cincinnati (Week 12) and Baltimore could all be top-level pass
defenses by the second half of the season, but I don’t see
a defense with two near-elite corners capable of keeping both
Johnson and Hopkins in check all game. Of course, all this bodes
well for Fitzpatrick, who could easily maintain respectable fantasy
QB2 numbers all season long and even has an outside shot at finishing
among the top 15-16 at his position if keeps the job all year
(which he should do if he stays healthy).
Indianapolis Colts |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEN |
PHI |
JAC |
TEN |
BAL |
HOU |
CIN |
PIT |
NYG |
bye |
NE |
JAC |
WAS |
CLE |
HOU |
DAL |
QB |
Andrew Luck |
24 |
24.5 |
24.5 |
367.4 |
367.4 |
4310 |
|
320 |
285 |
320 |
245 |
260 |
280 |
260 |
300 |
285 |
|
245 |
310 |
345 |
245 |
280 |
330 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
20 |
35 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
35 |
25 |
5 |
10 |
|
15 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Trent Richardson |
24 |
14.6 |
11.4 |
219 |
171 |
990 |
|
60 |
75 |
50 |
85 |
50 |
70 |
45 |
60 |
85 |
|
35 |
65 |
75 |
75 |
60 |
100 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
25 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
35 |
10 |
20 |
|
35 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Ahmad Bradshaw |
28 |
6 |
4.5 |
59.5 |
44.5 |
275 |
|
20 |
30 |
30 |
45 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
20 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Dan Herron |
25 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
33.5 |
28.5 |
195 |
|
10 |
10 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
|
20 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Reggie Wayne |
35 |
14.5 |
9.2 |
217.5 |
138.5 |
1025 |
|
50 |
75 |
85 |
65 |
65 |
70 |
75 |
50 |
60 |
|
35 |
100 |
85 |
75 |
70 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
5 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
|
2 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
T.Y. Hilton |
24 |
15.7 |
10.8 |
235.5 |
162.5 |
1205 |
|
110 |
35 |
115 |
40 |
85 |
125 |
40 |
90 |
70 |
|
25 |
70 |
125 |
65 |
100 |
110 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
7 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
2 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Hakeem Nicks |
26 |
10 |
6.5 |
119.5 |
77.5 |
535 |
|
40 |
85 |
30 |
45 |
35 |
INJ |
50 |
60 |
50 |
|
50 |
40 |
20 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
3 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
INJ |
4 |
5 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Coby Fleener |
25 |
6.3 |
4 |
94.5 |
59.5 |
415 |
|
25 |
10 |
35 |
15 |
25 |
25 |
10 |
20 |
25 |
|
40 |
30 |
50 |
10 |
50 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dwayne Allen |
24 |
8.6 |
5.6 |
129.5 |
83.5 |
535 |
|
30 |
40 |
20 |
45 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
40 |
55 |
|
60 |
45 |
25 |
40 |
20 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
General overview: The Colts are an
interesting prohibitive favorite in their division in that they
are still a team in transition. Given his defensive background,
HC Chuck Pagano probably would love nothing more than for Indianapolis
to be a smash-mouth team on offense that wins just about as many
games on defense as it does on offense. The defense has improved
over his first two years of leadership, but Richardson’s 2013
dud following his early-season trade from Cleveland has the running
game in roughly the same spot now as it was when Pagano arrived,
especially after sparkplug Donald Brown bolted for the Chargers.
For all the good things GM Ryan Grigson has done since he took over
in Indianapolis, he has yet to add a blue-chip offensive lineman
to the mix. The Colts did use their first pick in May – a
second-round selection – on versatile OL Jack Mewhort, but
his addition was about the only notable one on a unit that needs
more power to make Richardson is the right fit in Indianapolis.
There’s not a lot of evidence that Richardson is “the
man” after two years in the league, but one only needs to
remember he scored 12 total touchdowns and rushed for nearly 1,000
yards as a rookie in 2012 behind a Browns’ offensive line
that was essentially the same one that could not support one running
back worth owning following his trade. Coming off an ACL injury,
Wayne should be the biggest question mark, but he may not even be
that at his own position since Nicks inked a one-year deal in the
offseason. The good news is that Nicks probably can’t be any
worse than Darrius Heyward-Bey was, but the bad news is the ex-Giant
hasn’t looked like himself since 2011. Have his chronic foot
injuries made him a league-average receiver already? Was he trying
to “protect himself” in his contract year last year?
Or will the move from Eli Manning to Luck be enough to revive his
career? Matchup analysis: After
OC Pep Hamilton stuck with the run last year long after he should
have realized he didn’t have the linemen necessary to carry
out a power rushing attack, expect him to be less stubborn in
his second season as a play-caller against a bevy of opponents
that lack the depth to contain Luck and all of his weapons in
the passing game. Luck doesn’t have the easiest of schedules,
but it is also far from the most difficult since this division
and the NFC East contain a number of soft pass defenses, meaning
the biggest impediment to his rise to the top of the fantasy quarterback
mountain could be Hamilton. Owners have a right to be leery about
a player like Wayne entering his age-35 season and coming off
such a serious injury, but given the fact that he is no longer
the sole focus of defensive coordinators trying to stop the Colts’
passing game, he represents solid value in the eighth round. Although
Revis (Week 11) and Haden (Week 14) may be able to shadow the
old man, Wayne has plenty of green and white boxes to be a top-end
WR3 in fantasy if his knee holds up. Hilton carried the passing
game at times following Wayne’s season-ending injury and
probably shouldn’t see that big of a hit to his numbers
even if the longtime vet plays all 16 games. Hilton, like Randall
Cobb last week, works out of the slot so much that he is going
to be a threat to blow up every week; most defenses simply do
not have a slot corner capable of defending him. As for Richardson,
he still has enough working against him. In addition to the fact
that his power game does not fit well with the Colts’ mostly-finesse
front five, the AFC North and South should contain a fair number
of solid run defenses. Denver (Week 1) should be improved in that
regard as well, while teams like the Broncos, Eagles (Week 2)
and Redskins (Week 13) could all make the game enough of a track
meet where Richardson becomes a bit of a forgotten man.
Jacksonville Jaguars |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHI |
WAS |
IND |
SD |
PIT |
TEN |
CLE |
MIA |
CIN |
DAL |
bye |
IND |
NYG |
HOU |
BAL |
TEN |
QB |
Chad Henne |
29 |
13.5 |
13.5 |
162.3 |
162.3 |
2670 |
|
210 |
300 |
235 |
195 |
185 |
285 |
205 |
230 |
175 |
220 |
|
190 |
240 |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
3 |
2 |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
5 |
10 |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Blake Bortles |
22 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
56.6 |
56.6 |
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
185 |
280 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
15 |
30 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Toby Gerhart |
27 |
16.1 |
13.2 |
225.5 |
184.5 |
1110 |
|
80 |
110 |
55 |
85 |
100 |
75 |
45 |
INJ |
70 |
125 |
|
80 |
70 |
70 |
55 |
90 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
20 |
35 |
50 |
15 |
10 |
35 |
15 |
INJ |
20 |
10 |
|
20 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
INJ |
2 |
1 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Denard Robinson |
23 |
3.8 |
3 |
53.5 |
42.5 |
265 |
|
25 |
15 |
15 |
35 |
10 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
|
40 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
10 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
|
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jordan Todman |
24 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
42 |
33 |
180 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
55 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
10 |
5 |
10 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Cecil Shorts |
26 |
13.5 |
8.3 |
175 |
108 |
840 |
|
65 |
110 |
70 |
40 |
65 |
70 |
INJ |
INJ |
50 |
75 |
|
40 |
50 |
70 |
60 |
75 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
5 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
4 |
|
3 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Marqise Lee |
22 |
9 |
5.8 |
135.5 |
87.5 |
635 |
|
35 |
55 |
20 |
40 |
55 |
70 |
10 |
25 |
60 |
45 |
|
30 |
40 |
60 |
25 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Allen Robinson |
21 |
6.7 |
4.2 |
100 |
63 |
450 |
|
30 |
40 |
10 |
50 |
20 |
20 |
65 |
55 |
15 |
30 |
|
30 |
15 |
30 |
10 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ace Sanders |
22 |
2.7 |
1.4 |
30 |
15 |
150 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
10 |
10 |
25 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
|
10 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Marcedes Lewis |
30 |
8.1 |
5.1 |
121 |
76 |
520 |
|
40 |
35 |
55 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
40 |
60 |
20 |
25 |
|
30 |
35 |
45 |
30 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Clay Harbor |
27 |
4 |
2.5 |
60 |
38 |
260 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
30 |
0 |
30 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
10 |
|
20 |
40 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: When a team ranks
last in scoring in this offensive era, changes (and usually a lot
of them) will be made. The Jaguars got a much-needed infusion of
youth and talent through the draft and free agency, perhaps leaving
fantasy owners with a player or two they can count on for the majority
of the 2014 season. The most important addition for fantasy purposes
is Gerhart, who is probably one of three or four runners with a
realistic at 300 carries if he can hold up for 16 games. Jacksonville’s
secondary figures to remain a weak link to its defense, but for
the games in which it can hold up, Gerhart should push 20-25 carries
in those contests because the Jags should have a much better run
defense. Denard Robinson is reportedly recovered from the nerve
issue that dogged him at the end of his college career as well as
his rookie season and could become the team’s preferred choice
as the change-of-pace back. Todman proved he could handle that role
as well last year, although it should be said that HC Gus Bradley
has made it clear that is all he sees Robinson and Todman as –
change-of-pace backs. With the selection of second-round WRs Lee
and Allen Robinson, Jacksonville should eventually have enough firepower
to drastically improve their 15.4 point-per-game mark from a season
ago. Furthermore, the two rookies should allow Shorts to spend much
more time in the slot, enabling Henne to target his favorite receiver
against the defense’s nickelback on a more regular basis.
As far as Henne is concerned, the odds seem long that he will start
all 16 games. Despite all of its improvements, Jacksonville will
probably be out of the playoff race by around Week 15 or 16, which
would give the coaching staff a nice window in which to evaluate
Bortles before turning things over to him in 2015. Matchup
analysis: Just like Maurice Jones-Drew has been in recent
years from the running back position, Gerhart will easily be the
most relevant Jaguar in fantasy. Volume – be it on the ground
or through the air – should not be a problem for him, which
means durability and game situation will make more of a difference
to him than matchups in a lot of cases, although he is probably
going to get his yards regardless since he is an asset as a receiver.
As a result, the ex-Viking could see a lot of work in the passing
game through the first five weeks simply because each team has
the weapons to pick apart Jacksonville’s secondary. Weeks
6-10 offer less dynamic offenses, while the five post-bye games
provide a healthy mixture of both. It is virtually impossible
to predict what Shorts might do for a number of reasons: 1) he
has yet to play a full season, 2) he’s never consistently
had as much talent around him at his position as he does now and
3) so much of his production in previous years has come when the
team is trailing that it is hard to discern what he will do if
and when the team is more competitive (which it should be this
season). Although Shorts isn’t going to get any red boxes
on his schedule, it bears mentioning that he’ll have some
difficult fantasy matchups because of who his quarterback(s) will
be. Most of his yellows would be reds if he was simply going
to remain an outside receiver only. Allen Robinson will be
Shorts’ direct backup, so if/when Shorts gets hurt, he could
be the most valuable receiver on the team. With that said, Lee
is the better redraft pick for now and should bring a bit of the
big play back to the offense if he is recovered from his college
injuries. It should be fairly obvious as No. 2 and 3 options in
a run-heavy offense with a below-average quarterback, but neither
of the rookies should be trusted as anything more than low-end
WR4 this year.
Tennessee Titans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KC |
DAL |
CIN |
IND |
CLE |
JAC |
WAS |
HOU |
bye |
BAL |
PIT |
PHI |
HOU |
NYG |
NYJ |
JAC |
QB |
Jake Locker |
26 |
20 |
20 |
239.7 |
239.7 |
2955 |
|
275 |
240 |
280 |
235 |
275 |
280 |
285 |
210 |
|
245 |
90 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
235 |
305 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
20 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
15 |
30 |
20 |
|
20 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Charlie Whitehurst |
32 |
13.6 |
13.6 |
54.4 |
54.4 |
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
250 |
215 |
225 |
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Bishop Sankey |
21 |
15.3 |
12.5 |
229.5 |
187.5 |
1145 |
|
75 |
100 |
80 |
100 |
55 |
105 |
60 |
85 |
|
60 |
85 |
70 |
60 |
70 |
85 |
55 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
20 |
5 |
15 |
50 |
20 |
0 |
50 |
15 |
|
20 |
35 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Shonn Greene |
29 |
4.9 |
4.3 |
49 |
43 |
220 |
|
20 |
20 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
10 |
15 |
25 |
35 |
30 |
15 |
40 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Dexter McCluster |
26 |
8.6 |
5.2 |
120.5 |
72.5 |
145 |
|
15 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
|
20 |
INJ |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
30 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
40 |
30 |
15 |
|
45 |
INJ |
55 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
5 |
INJ |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kendall Wright |
24 |
14.4 |
8.9 |
215.5 |
133.5 |
1035 |
|
65 |
80 |
110 |
65 |
55 |
120 |
60 |
45 |
|
35 |
90 |
75 |
65 |
30 |
80 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
4 |
6 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
|
3 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nate Washington |
31 |
9.7 |
6 |
146 |
90 |
720 |
|
35 |
65 |
45 |
50 |
40 |
65 |
75 |
45 |
|
70 |
45 |
15 |
30 |
55 |
65 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
6 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Justin Hunter |
23 |
11.5 |
8 |
161.5 |
112.5 |
705 |
|
60 |
35 |
50 |
25 |
90 |
30 |
INJ |
60 |
|
20 |
70 |
45 |
65 |
25 |
30 |
100 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
INJ |
4 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Delanie Walker |
30 |
9.5 |
5.6 |
142.5 |
84.5 |
605 |
|
50 |
30 |
45 |
20 |
50 |
25 |
70 |
30 |
|
55 |
15 |
40 |
25 |
75 |
30 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
5 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
|
General overview: If new HC Ken Whisenhunt
has shown us anything over the years, it is the ability to adapt
his offensive scheme to his personnel. Locker completed 60-plus
percent of his passes for the first time in his three-year career
in 2013, but continued to be one of the more snake-bitten players
at his position and has played in only 18 of 32 games over the last
two years due to ailments to his hip, foot and shoulder. Although
his skill-set is nearly the opposite of Whisenhunt’s last
protégé in Philip Rivers, the new coach – along
with OC Jason Michael – are expected to utilize the same short-passing
and run-heavy approach that San Diego experienced such great success
with last season. The first half of that equation will fall mostly
on the shoulders of Wright, who is expected to be this regime’s
(smaller but faster) version of Keenan Allen. When Hunter wasn’t
either in the doghouse or on the verge of heading there, he showed
a knack for taking over the game as a rookie. With nothing but positives
coming out of Titans’ camp this year about Hunter, expect
a huge second-year leap from him. Walker was also a bit of a revelation
in 2013 and should probably expect to make a similar impact this
season considering Whisenhunt (a former NFL tight end) just spent
a year working with Antonio Gates and Ladarius Green. The second
half of the aforementioned pass-run equation will depend on whether
Tennessee got its Chris Johnson replacement right with the selection
of Sankey. The top runner selected in May’s draft, Sankey
brings impressive inside running ability for a back of his size
(5-10, 209) to a team that owns one of the better offensive lines
in the league. McCluster and Greene will steal some touches, but
Sankey is a solid bet for 275-plus touches unless he completely
falls on his face in the preseason. Matchup
analysis: This entire division figures to reap the benefits
of trading in the NFC West for the NFC East and perhaps no AFC
South coach will have a better understanding of the East than
Whisenhunt, who saw the Cowboys, Giants, Eagles and Redskins as
a play-caller with the Chargers last season. It won’t be
all easy, however, as the Titans inherit the AFC North and face
improved defenses in their own division. Still, Sankey has more
than enough tools to succeed if Whisenhunt remains as committed
to the run as he did with San Diego a season ago. While the rookie
doesn’t have any lengthy green-and-white runs on his schedule,
he doesn’t have any extended yellow-or-red streaks either.
A healthy Greene might change things, but that is unlikely to
happen. (McCluster is extremely unlikely to handle significant
carries.) Owning a Titan receiver during the fantasy playoffs
should be more than boom than bust, which should allow Wright
to cap off another fine season in which he’ll square off
against very few elite corners and move across the formation enough
to generally avoid the ones he does face. Inconsistency still
figures to remain a part of Hunter’s game, although outside
of Cincinnati (Week 3), Baltimore (Week 10), Pittsburgh (Week
11) and the New York Giants (Week 14), there aren’t a lot
of teams that have a second – much less a top – cornerback
capable of dealing with his athleticism. The same can pretty much
be said about Walker and the linebackers/safeties he will attract;
the only potentially difficult stretch he should face is during
the three weeks following the Titans’ Week 9 bye. IF Locker
can stay healthy all season, expend a few struggles in the first
half but mostly smooth sailing otherwise; in this offense, he
should a more than capable QB2 for fantasy owners in 2014.
NFC South
Atlanta Falcons |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO |
CIN |
TB |
MIN |
NYG |
CHI |
BAL |
DET |
bye |
TB |
CAR |
CLE |
ARI |
GB |
PIT |
NO |
QB |
Matt Ryan |
29 |
23.1 |
23.1 |
346.2 |
346.2 |
4280 |
|
270 |
300 |
265 |
290 |
230 |
365 |
235 |
380 |
|
280 |
215 |
310 |
270 |
300 |
300 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Steven Jackson |
31 |
12.2 |
9.9 |
183 |
149 |
850 |
|
65 |
50 |
70 |
60 |
65 |
55 |
45 |
30 |
|
50 |
30 |
75 |
50 |
60 |
75 |
70 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
15 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
|
15 |
0 |
25 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Devonta Freeman |
22 |
9.6 |
6.8 |
144 |
102 |
415 |
|
30 |
35 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
|
30 |
25 |
35 |
40 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
20 |
30 |
5 |
35 |
25 |
35 |
10 |
25 |
|
20 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
65 |
10 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Roddy White |
32 |
17.9 |
11.8 |
268.5 |
176.5 |
1225 |
|
85 |
115 |
75 |
55 |
80 |
115 |
50 |
105 |
|
60 |
80 |
105 |
90 |
55 |
85 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
6 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
8 |
|
5 |
7 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Julio Jones |
25 |
19.7 |
13.5 |
295 |
202 |
1360 |
|
90 |
80 |
135 |
105 |
65 |
90 |
75 |
140 |
|
90 |
65 |
75 |
50 |
100 |
120 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
6 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
10 |
|
6 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Harry Douglas |
29 |
10.7 |
6.5 |
160.5 |
97.5 |
735 |
|
50 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
30 |
60 |
85 |
70 |
|
55 |
30 |
65 |
40 |
25 |
60 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Levine Toilolo |
23 |
4 |
2.6 |
60.5 |
38.5 |
205 |
|
0 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
|
40 |
5 |
25 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
4 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
General overview: As much as the retirement
of TE Tony Gonzalez frees up White and Jones to post insane numbers,
one has to wonder if the offense as a whole will drop off –
especially in the red zone. The Falcons will transition into a base
set of three receivers with Gonzalez out of the picture and spent
the offseason trying to get a little nastier on offense by fortifying
the offensive line, which should help the Falcons’ porous
run game from a season ago. Gonzalez’s departure – plus
the slight shift in base personnel – means Douglas has a chance
at the first meaningful playing time of his career that hasn’t
come as a result of White or Jones getting hurt. The additions of
RG Jon Asamoah in free agency and RT Jake Matthews through the draft
should shore up what was, at times, an abysmal right side of the
offensive line. As a result, a minor bounce-back season from Jackson
cannot be ruled out assuming he can avoid the soft-tissue injuries
that have plagued him at various points throughout his career. Atlanta
made have secured its future lead back in the fourth round of May’s
draft with Freeman, who has done nothing but impress this offseason
and is a major improvement over Jacquizz Rodgers. The Florida State
alum will almost certainly start out as the third-down and “breather”
back for Jackson, but the rookie carries significant upside in that
he brings a burst that the veteran just doesn’t have anymore.
With the necessary personnel in the passing game to get defenses
to play honest, getting Freeman into space will be easier than it
will be for most rookie running backs. Matchup
analysis: Ryan’s job becomes slightly more difficult
now without Gonzalez wizardry in the red zone; it is safe to say
that Toilolo and Douglas will not make up for the loss of the
retired tight end. While Jones and White will attract more attention
as a result, they will also be targeted more often out of necessity.
The schedule for both players will allow that to happen with more
success since only the Saints (Weeks 1 and 16), Giants (Week 5),
Cardinals (Week 13) and perhaps the Bears (Week 6) and Ravens
(Week 7) have much of a chance to contain one or both of the star
receivers. Owners that are able to grab both as their fantasy
WR1 and WR2 should be rewarded handsomely, assuming both can avoid
the injuries that sabotaged their 2013 campaigns. Even though
he’ll see much less action than he did last season, Douglas
could make for a decent bye-week WR3 in PPR leagues since only
about half of the opponents have capable nickelback options (Saints,
Bengals, Giants, Bears, Ravens, Cardinals and Packers). Toilolo
should pretty much be a non-factor, but one player that will benefit
from Gonzalez’s absence should be Freeman. The rookie will
probably be more of a niche player in his first year (suggesting
his fantasy value will fluctuate more based on game situations
than individual/team matchups), but the need for Ryan to find
someone when he gets quick pressure should enable Freeman to push
40 receptions if he makes Rodgers an afterthought. Jackson should
have a couple of pockets for decent production, although I expect
the majority of the second-half slate to be up to the task of
slowing him down. Still, Jackson’s work in the passing game
plus his touchdown-scoring upside should make him a respectable
back-end RB2 option most weeks. Ryan’s season could go south
quickly if Jones and/or White get hurt again, but he has a good
scheme and more than enough talent (personal as well as team)
to work his way through all the yellow, especially if the offensive
line makes the kind of improvement it should.
Carolina Panthers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TB |
DET |
PIT |
BAL |
CHI |
CIN |
GB |
SEA |
NO |
PHI |
ATL |
bye |
MIN |
NO |
TB |
CLE |
QB |
Cam Newton |
25 |
22.6 |
22.6 |
338.9 |
338.9 |
3560 |
|
215 |
295 |
160 |
215 |
290 |
180 |
295 |
165 |
260 |
295 |
320 |
|
205 |
210 |
235 |
220 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
565 |
|
35 |
50 |
20 |
40 |
70 |
35 |
40 |
25 |
55 |
30 |
25 |
|
35 |
20 |
40 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
DeAngelo Williams |
31 |
8.9 |
7.6 |
133.5 |
114.5 |
665 |
|
20 |
40 |
30 |
65 |
25 |
30 |
40 |
75 |
30 |
15 |
35 |
|
105 |
40 |
85 |
30 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
40 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
70 |
|
45 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jonathan Stewart |
27 |
8.7 |
7.1 |
112.5 |
92.5 |
580 |
|
45 |
50 |
60 |
30 |
65 |
45 |
40 |
30 |
60 |
35 |
40 |
|
50 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
35 |
20 |
|
5 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike Tolbert |
28 |
7.5 |
5.7 |
112 |
85 |
265 |
|
25 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
|
5 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
20 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
|
10 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kelvin Benjamin |
23 |
12.1 |
8.5 |
182 |
127 |
850 |
|
55 |
85 |
25 |
40 |
35 |
70 |
105 |
10 |
45 |
85 |
110 |
|
30 |
60 |
70 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jerricho Cotchery |
32 |
10.2 |
6.5 |
152.5 |
97.5 |
675 |
|
35 |
55 |
65 |
40 |
45 |
20 |
50 |
35 |
70 |
40 |
30 |
|
45 |
50 |
60 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
3 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
|
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jason Avant |
31 |
2.9 |
1.5 |
44 |
22 |
220 |
|
10 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
15 |
35 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Tavarres King |
24 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
26 |
17 |
110 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Greg Olsen |
29 |
12.6 |
7.9 |
189.5 |
118.5 |
825 |
|
70 |
55 |
40 |
55 |
85 |
35 |
70 |
50 |
40 |
65 |
35 |
|
60 |
30 |
50 |
85 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
6 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
6 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Ed Dickson |
27 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
31.5 |
16.5 |
165 |
|
10 |
20 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
|
0 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
General overview: The general consensus
for most of the offseason has been the Panthers will have one of
the worst wide receiver corps in the league. While that statement
may be partially true, it also discounts the possibility the 6-5
and 240-pound Benjamin will be a matchup nightmare from the moment
he hits the field and the fact that Cotchery has been a more-than-capable
second receiver in the league for some time. GM Dave Gettleman knew
he was going to have to overhaul the position at some point in the
near future with Steve Smith nearing the end and no one else in
the pipeline that could overtake Brandon LaFell. The bigger issue
is the likelihood that two former college free agents will be manning
the tackle spots (LT Nate Chandler and RT Byron Bell) following
the retirement of LT Jordan Gross. Chandler and Bell both graded
out negatively in 2013 according to Pro Football Focus while projected
RG Garry Williams played only 15 snaps last season before tearing
his ACL. It’s a lot of unrest up front for a team that wants
to run the football as much as the Panthers do. Add to that the
age of DeAngelo Williams (31) and injury history of Stewart and
there is reason to think Newton – he of the offseason ankle
surgery – may have to carry this offense in the same kind
of way he did as a rookie in order for the Panthers to repeat last
season’s success. Olsen is the one constant besides Newton
in this offense and should be as consistently targeted as any of
the tight ends in the league not named Jimmy Graham, Gronkowski
or Julius Thomas. Matchup analysis:
Newton’s talent as a runner and a passer is about the only
thing holding me back from handing out about five more reds. While
I do expect the receivers to perform at least to the level of
last year’s group and Newton to be able to match his numbers
from a season ago, it is certainly not out of the realm of possibility
that he throws for fewer than 250 yards AND one score or less
more times than he exceeds those marks. The Panthers have no shortage
of teams on their schedule with top-level and/or bigger corners
that can make Benjamin work for everything he gets. Since he figures
to be raw as a route-runner for at least his first season, the
rookie’s biggest impact will probably come as a red-zone
specialist that will post the occasional big game because he is
essentially being forced into the top receiver role. As his matchup
line suggests, his only break might come in the three weeks sandwiching
the Panthers’ Week 12 bye. Cotchery should actually end
up being the more consistent fantasy receiver in 2014 and proved
he was still able to make plays with Pittsburgh last year, turning
10 of his 46 catches into touchdowns. Cotchery may get some work
in the slot, but there is next-to-no chance that he sniffs double-digit
scores again with Olsen and Benjamin around to hog red-zone targets.
Olsen’s path to fantasy relevancy isn’t as daunting
as Benjamin’s, but it is far from a cakewalk either. Still,
the odds are pretty good that the former Bear is going to be targeted
as much this year as he was during the second half of 2013 (8.1
per game from Week 11 on, with no fewer than six in any of those
weeks). September could be brutal for the running game, especially
if Pittsburgh (Week 3) returns to form. Even though the path gets
a little less bumpy after that, Carolina’s committee approach
is going to make selecting the top runner from this backfield
about as much fun as reading Bill Belichick’s mind when
it comes to his backfield in New England.
New Orleans Saints |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATL |
CLE |
MIN |
DAL |
TB |
bye |
DET |
GB |
CAR |
SF |
CIN |
BAL |
PIT |
CAR |
CHI |
ATL |
QB |
Drew Brees |
35 |
25.5 |
25.5 |
382 |
382 |
4875 |
|
330 |
285 |
335 |
365 |
365 |
|
345 |
355 |
285 |
300 |
275 |
330 |
275 |
330 |
330 |
370 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Pierre Thomas |
29 |
12.1 |
7.8 |
181.5 |
116.5 |
475 |
|
35 |
30 |
55 |
45 |
20 |
|
20 |
35 |
10 |
30 |
55 |
30 |
40 |
20 |
15 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
35 |
25 |
55 |
20 |
20 |
|
45 |
50 |
10 |
40 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
40 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
5 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
|
7 |
7 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Khiry Robinson |
24 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
124 |
114 |
770 |
|
50 |
35 |
70 |
55 |
35 |
|
40 |
70 |
75 |
35 |
65 |
55 |
25 |
35 |
80 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mark Ingram |
24 |
6.7 |
6.2 |
73.5 |
68.5 |
420 |
|
25 |
60 |
20 |
75 |
15 |
|
25 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
30 |
55 |
55 |
50 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandin Cooks |
20 |
12.5 |
8.3 |
187.5 |
124.5 |
125 |
|
10 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
880 |
|
50 |
40 |
25 |
80 |
55 |
|
120 |
40 |
40 |
65 |
50 |
30 |
75 |
55 |
65 |
90 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
|
7 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Marques Colston |
31 |
14 |
9.1 |
210 |
136 |
940 |
|
70 |
55 |
80 |
50 |
60 |
|
60 |
35 |
70 |
55 |
105 |
70 |
60 |
85 |
40 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
5 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
|
5 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kenny Stills |
22 |
10.7 |
7.5 |
161 |
113 |
830 |
|
50 |
35 |
75 |
110 |
35 |
|
15 |
85 |
30 |
70 |
20 |
70 |
30 |
60 |
45 |
100 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jimmy Graham |
27 |
20.6 |
14.2 |
308.5 |
213.5 |
1355 |
|
85 |
110 |
100 |
75 |
155 |
|
85 |
105 |
75 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
50 |
85 |
125 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
6 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
10 |
|
6 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Ben Watson |
33 |
3.8 |
2.4 |
57 |
36 |
240 |
|
20 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
25 |
|
20 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
General overview: The Saints say they
want to run the ball more seemingly every year. It makes some sense
to do so this season with the losses of passing game cogs like Darren
Sproles and Lance Moore, but this year’s rushing attack improvement
may very well come as a result of the passing game having so many
weapons that New Orleans will be able to run out the clock in a
lot of fourth quarters. At least for fantasy purposes, Graham is
every bit as dominant at tight end as Calvin Johnson is at receiver
in Detroit, if not more so. Mot defenses simply do not have a linebacker
or safety capable of handling Graham (not every team can use Talib
on him as New England did in 2013). Stills should be in for a nice
bump in playing time and fantasy numbers with Moore out of the picture,
although it seems unlikely the Saints will turn a player who averaged
20 yards per catch as a rookie into a chain-mover, so expect him
to retain his Devery Henderson-plus role in this offense. HC Sean
Payton & Co. raised eyebrows everywhere on draft night when
New Orleans traded up for Cooks, who is a plus version of Stills
with serious route-running chops. Although he isn’t considered
a running back (nor should he be), it has been widely assumed he
will fill the void left behind by Sproles. The running game is undergoing
a transition of its own, with Robinson working his way into the
Saints’ three-man rotation. None of the three (Thomas, Robinson
and Ingram) should be expected to be the man at any point of the
season barring injury, but Robinson has a chance to nudge Ingram
out of the mix if the undrafted free agent continues to impress
like he did at the end of last season.
Matchup analysis: Let’s face
it: there aren’t many defenses that warrant a red box against
Brees (except maybe the Seahawks in Seattle), so I’m not
going to make the case for any. Cleveland (Week 2) and Tampa Bay
(Week 4) each offer potential yellows – as do Cincinnati
(Week 11) and Pittsburgh (Week 13) – but three of the four
games are at home and the one that is not is against a Browns’
secondary that probably won’t be playing up to its high-end
potential quite yet. As I tried to reason why Graham won’t
be able to match last year’s numbers because of the addition
of a player like Cooks, it became clear that he almost has to
reach those benchmarks and possibly do more since Cooks and Stills
will probably be the ones responsible for picking up the 108 receptions
left behind by Moore and Sproles. Unsurprisingly, Graham has a
ridiculous amount of green on his schedule and will probably eclipse
100 catches for the first time in his career. The Saints’
receivers are a difficult lot to project since Colston and Graham
do a lot of their damage from the slot. Cooks is probably going
to see plenty of opportunity inside as well, but is just as likely
to come out of the backfield a handful of times every game. In
short, it makes it almost impossible to slap a red box on any
of the key members of the New Orleans’ passing game. As
for the running backs, Thomas seems like a good bet to repeat
last year’s numbers since he is the best receiver of the
bunch and seems locked into about 10 carries per game. Thomas
avoids any red boxes given his contributions in the passing game,
but Robinson and Ingram obviously aren’t as lucky. Both
backs should benefit from the Saints playing with the lead in
games – especially before the bye – but they face
a difficult stretch that includes Detroit, Carolina (twice), San
Francisco and the top three AFC North teams over an eight-week
stretch in the second half of the season.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Avg |
NPPR Avg |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAR |
STL |
ATL |
PIT |
NO |
BAL |
bye |
MIN |
CLE |
ATL |
WAS |
CHI |
CIN |
DET |
CAR |
GB |
QB |
Josh McCown |
35 |
18.4 |
18.4 |
276.2 |
276.2 |
3980 |
|
270 |
290 |
290 |
215 |
280 |
220 |
|
285 |
185 |
305 |
330 |
285 |
250 |
305 |
200 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Doug Martin |
25 |
13.9 |
11.3 |
208.5 |
169.5 |
1055 |
|
65 |
80 |
45 |
65 |
50 |
60 |
|
70 |
90 |
70 |
110 |
75 |
75 |
60 |
55 |
85 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
15 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
|
15 |
25 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
25 |
35 |
0 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Charles Sims |
23 |
7.6 |
5.1 |
113.5 |
76.5 |
330 |
|
15 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
|
25 |
40 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
40 |
10 |
|
25 |
10 |
35 |
45 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike James |
23 |
2.2 |
1.8 |
32.5 |
27.5 |
185 |
|
10 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
25 |
10 |
|
15 |
20 |
30 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Vincent Jackson |
31 |
14.9 |
10.1 |
224 |
152 |
1100 |
|
75 |
110 |
85 |
50 |
70 |
40 |
|
85 |
45 |
115 |
105 |
40 |
60 |
90 |
70 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
5 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
|
5 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Evans |
21 |
13.1 |
9 |
196 |
135 |
930 |
|
70 |
55 |
80 |
50 |
30 |
65 |
|
55 |
45 |
85 |
100 |
60 |
65 |
65 |
45 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Louis Murphy |
27 |
2 |
1.1 |
24.5 |
13.5 |
135 |
|
25 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
0 |
|
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
25 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Chris Owusu |
24 |
3.9 |
2.6 |
38.5 |
25.5 |
195 |
|
15 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
15 |
|
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Robert Herron |
22 |
2.8 |
1.4 |
41.5 |
21.5 |
215 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
20 |
10 |
|
0 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
45 |
40 |
15 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Austin Seferian-Jenkins |
21 |
5.7 |
3.5 |
85 |
53 |
350 |
|
20 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
30 |
40 |
20 |
15 |
55 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Tim Wright |
24 |
6.3 |
3.7 |
95 |
55 |
430 |
|
35 |
20 |
10 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
|
35 |
10 |
10 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
45 |
40 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
|
General overview: Upon drafting Evans
and Seferian-Jenkins, new Bucs GM Jason Licht dubbed his trio (including
Jackson) the “Dunkaneers” because each player could
easily be mistaken for an undersized power forward on the basketball
court (all three of them were actual former standout basketball
players in high school and two – Jackson and Seferian-Jenkins
– played a bit in college). All three players are at least
6-5 and 230 pounds and will provide McCown with familiar size after
leaving Chicago, where he went from journeyman quarterback to a
veteran signal-caller that posted a 13:1 touchdown-to-interception
ratio in about half a season in 2013. So one year after needing
to rely on Jackson – and Wright to a much lesser extent –
to carry the passing attack, McCown and perhaps Mike Glennon will
have more margin for error with their throws than just about any
quarterback in the league. The running game, which proved to have
plenty of depth last year, added one more talented piece to the
puzzle in Sims, who drew plenty of Matt Forte comparisons while
in college. Given the number of times new OC Jeff Tedford has stated
that he believes in spreading the workload among his backs, it seems
pretty certain that Martin will be hard-pressed to come anywhere
close to his amazing rookie year – even if his odds of making
it through the season increase. Sims can be expected to get his
fair share of touches – mostly in the passing game –
and push Martin to the back end of fantasy RB1s as a result, something
that was probably going to happen anyway once the team released
OG Carl Nicks. Although Nicks played in only two games in 2013 (and
nine over the last two years), Nicks’ eventual return would
have given this ground game such much-needed push. His departure
leaves Tampa Bay with one of the weaker interior offensive line
units in the league.
Matchup analysis: Do not take the
relative lack of red on Martin’s matchup line as a recommendation
to draft him as anything more than a RB2 in fantasy; his natural
talent and contributions in the passing game are the only qualities
keeping him (or Sims) from about three more reds and three or
four more yellows. The schedule isn’t as daunting for them
as I am making it sound, but the aforementioned offensive line
issues will probably make every Tampa Bay back relatively inconsistent
– at least for a team that wants to run the ball as the
Bucs say they do. There really isn’t any overly favorable
part of the slate per se, although the first five weeks after
the bye could give owners a sell-high time if Atlanta’s
run defense isn’t as good as I think it will be. McCown
did not receive any red boxes, but that was more of a nod to the
fact that he has two receivers in Jackson and Evans that should
be able to help him avoid any disastrous weeks. Fortunately for
him, most of the teams that can bring a quick pass rush –
such as Carolina and St. Louis in the first two weeks of the season
and the Lions and Panthers in the first two weeks of the fantasy
playoffs – lack top-level cornerbacks. The toughest matchups
for the receivers are sandwiched around the bye with New Orleans
and Baltimore (Weeks 5 and 6) as well as Cleveland (Week 9) possessing
enough quality defenders in the secondary to make life difficult
for the Bucs’ behemoth receivers. Cincinnati (Week 13) and
Green Bay (Week 16) also could provide potential pitfalls if both
defenses can stay healthy that long.
Suggestions, comments, about the article or
fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today
since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview
magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long,
pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past
season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on
Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The
Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association. |