A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Even though Jeremy Maclin and Dennis Pitta do not reside in the
division we’ll cover this week, their season-ending injuries
started training camp off with a resounding thud. Just as the
coaches and general managers of the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore
Ravens must adjust to their new realities without their top receivers,
fantasy owners must also re-examine our new reality when it comes
to how it affects their teammates.
Season-ending injuries at any time of the year are unfortunate.
However, if they are going to happen – and they will –
fantasy owners should be thankful for the ones that happen now
as opposed to Week 1 or Week 2. Maclin’s injury takes one
receiver away from a very deep pool of receivers while Pitta’s
absence will only increase the importance of landing a premier
tight end early. The losses of Aaron Hernandez and Pitta have
sapped the position of the players most likely to post near-elite
numbers at a more reasonable cost than Jimmy Graham or Rob Gronkowski.
In my AFC and NFC East
Projection article two weeks ago, I spoke about how one key
injury can create a “ripple effect” for the entire
team, but the ripples do not stop there. Opponents can now consistently
bring a safety over the top of DeSean Jackson, leave the other
safety in the box to help against what we believe will be a run-heavy
attack from new HC Chip Kelly and take their chances that Riley
Cooper can beat single coverage 5-8 times per game. James Casey
might take on a bigger role than he was going to have as a movable
chess piece that can get down the field while Zach Ertz may be
forced into duty earlier than the Eagles would have liked. Fewer
explosive pass plays probably means less scoring for the offense,
which likely means more “desperation passing” for
either Michael Vick or Nick Foles and more time on the field for
the Eagles’ defense – making the Philadelphia defense
more attractive for opposing players to go against in fantasy.
For Baltimore, the loss of Pitta and Anquan Boldin means the
team lacks a proven slot option and drops Joe Flacco down several
pegs. The Ravens figured to lean heavily on the run this year
anyway, but the team will almost certainly struggle on third down
and in the red zone without Flacco’s favorite red-zone target.
Ed Dickson was already in line for an increased role before the
injury and will pick up a bit of Pitta’s slack while Ray
Rice figures to now push his career high in receptions, but even
the two of them combined can’t realistically expect to make
up for the likely 65-75 catches that Pitta probably was going
to collect. It is entirely possible the Ravens will see a ton
of blitzes as a result and – barring the emergence of an
unproven player like Deonte Thompson, Tommy Streeter or Tandon
Doss – may settle for a lot more field goals than they would
care to in 2013. Like Philadelphia, garbage-time passing and worn-out
defenses could become the norm.
Fortunately, I’ll spend as much time as necessary to make
sure you are still the smartest person in the draft room. In two
weeks, the first of three Big Boards will hit the site. In the
meantime, let’s discuss the one geographical area –
the South – that didn’t get hit by an injury (let’s
not forget Denver C Dan Koppen). Here’s a quick refresher
of what each of the colors mean in each team’s projection
chart below:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
White – Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.
Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see
below in the tables:
Notes:
- The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects
a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks
of the season.
- These are my initial projections and therefore subject
to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes
may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a
player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong
preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection
and the removal of another.
- For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately
to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals
because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. Additionally,
players with fewer than 10 projected catches or 100 projected
yards have been removed, which will explain the discrepancy
in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
- The age you see by each player will be that player’s
age as of September 1, 2013.
Key to the table below:
PPR Aver - Points
per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth
six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR
leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in
non-PPR.
AFC South
Houston Texans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SD |
TEN |
BAL |
SEA |
SF |
STL |
KC |
bye |
IND |
ARI |
OAK |
JAC |
NE |
JAC |
IND |
DEN |
QB |
Matt Schaub |
32 |
19 |
19 |
285.4 |
285.4 |
3960 |
|
265 |
245 |
300 |
210 |
255 |
255 |
165 |
|
310 |
245 |
255 |
305 |
280 |
255 |
335 |
280 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Arian Foster |
27 |
21 |
17.5 |
315 |
263 |
1260 |
|
70 |
105 |
75 |
45 |
70 |
85 |
110 |
|
105 |
70 |
115 |
75 |
85 |
110 |
75 |
65 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
|
15 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
25 |
50 |
10 |
|
25 |
35 |
5 |
35 |
40 |
10 |
60 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
|
4 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Ben Tate |
25 |
8.2 |
7.6 |
114.5 |
106.5 |
660 |
|
45 |
55 |
40 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
60 |
|
55 |
40 |
85 |
20 |
INJ |
60 |
55 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
INJ |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Andre Johnson |
32 |
18 |
12 |
270 |
180 |
1320 |
|
90 |
110 |
105 |
55 |
85 |
70 |
65 |
|
115 |
55 |
90 |
150 |
75 |
115 |
85 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
7 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
|
8 |
4 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
DeAndre Hopkins |
21 |
12.2 |
8.2 |
182.5 |
123.5 |
875 |
|
50 |
55 |
65 |
70 |
60 |
35 |
55 |
|
75 |
85 |
40 |
85 |
45 |
70 |
45 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
3 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lestar Jean |
25 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
21.5 |
13.5 |
135 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
25 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Keshawn Martin |
23 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
33.5 |
16.5 |
165 |
|
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
|
10 |
0 |
25 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Owen Daniels |
30 |
10.7 |
6.8 |
160.5 |
101.5 |
655 |
|
50 |
40 |
60 |
40 |
55 |
50 |
20 |
|
40 |
35 |
55 |
15 |
35 |
35 |
55 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Garrett Graham |
27 |
5.3 |
3.1 |
80 |
47 |
350 |
|
20 |
10 |
30 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
10 |
|
10 |
35 |
20 |
10 |
50 |
25 |
40 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
General overview: Two important upgrades
– including one that was already on the team – highlight
why the Texans are in a good position to make a Super Bowl run.
Hopkins represents the first real investment the team has made at
receiver since drafting Johnson in 2003 while Tate is trying to
put his injury-riddled 2012 season behind him. The upside two both
players is obvious: Hopkins’ ability to create big plays should
reduce the amount of attention Johnson sees all over the field –
particularly in the red zone – while Tate will allow for little
to no drop-off in the running game when Foster needs to rest. As
for the rest of the Houston offense, much will remain the same in
terms of philosophy. The Texans’ coaches have already said
they don’t want Foster setting another career in carries (351
in 2012), but he’s a safe bet for 300 and will have the offense
go through him just about every week. Tate should a regular dose
of 8-10 touches per week plus significant action in any blowout.
Schaub has evolved into a caretaker quarterback in recent years
given the success of Foster, but that likely had to do as much with
the absence of another viable receiving threat opposite Johnson
than anything else. Daniels might see fewer targets with Hopkins
around, but his value shouldn’t dip all that much because
he is a trusted red-zone option.
Matchup analysis: The Texans’
ability to navigate through their schedule in 2013 will depend
largely on the improvement the right side of the offensive line
has made. If they approach anything close to the level they played
at in 2011, then even Seattle and San Francisco don’t pose
a great threat even though those defenses will probably do the
best job of keeping the running game in check. Between the Chargers,
Ravens, Seahawks and Niners (perhaps even the Rams), the first-half
schedule is littered with teams capable of limiting the effectiveness
of a struggling right side. The post-bye slate is much more forgiving
in that only the Patriots and Broncos (and maybe the Cardinals)
figure to have the personnel to bottle up Foster and/or Tate.
IF the Texans decided to open up the passing game a bit, however,
Schaub could easily enjoy his best year since 2009. While Houston’s
passing game could have some issues in the four games leading
into the bye, most of the teams before and after that stretch
are either breaking new (or young) corners, have questionable
safety play or possess some the least-talented defensive backs
in the league. After the Texans’ Week 4-7 stretch, it is
conceivable that Denver is the only opponent of slowing down Johnson,
Hopkins and Daniels. In short, if any of the three main pass-catchers
has a poor season, it is unlikely to be because of the quality
of their opponents.
Indianapolis Colts |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OAK |
MIA |
SF |
JAC |
SEA |
SD |
DEN |
bye |
HOU |
STL |
TEN |
ARI |
TEN |
CIN |
HOU |
KC |
QB |
Andrew Luck |
23 |
22.4 |
22.4 |
336.7 |
336.7 |
4280 |
|
290 |
315 |
255 |
320 |
250 |
320 |
230 |
|
275 |
255 |
300 |
290 |
365 |
245 |
290 |
280 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
15 |
30 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
15 |
|
5 |
35 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
25 |
15 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Ahmad Bradshaw |
27 |
14 |
11 |
168.5 |
131.5 |
625 |
|
60 |
45 |
25 |
INJ |
50 |
60 |
35 |
|
45 |
80 |
55 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
65 |
85 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
20 |
40 |
15 |
INJ |
20 |
15 |
5 |
|
40 |
25 |
45 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
25 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
INJ |
4 |
2 |
1 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Vick Ballard |
23 |
9.8 |
8.2 |
147.5 |
122.5 |
770 |
|
45 |
40 |
50 |
80 |
35 |
45 |
55 |
|
60 |
50 |
35 |
65 |
50 |
85 |
30 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
10 |
5 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Reggie Wayne |
34 |
14.2 |
8.9 |
212.5 |
133.5 |
975 |
|
75 |
80 |
55 |
105 |
40 |
75 |
45 |
|
30 |
55 |
70 |
35 |
130 |
65 |
50 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
5 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
D
Heyward-Bey |
26 |
11.8 |
7.8 |
165 |
109 |
790 |
|
80 |
35 |
65 |
70 |
25 |
60 |
30 |
|
65 |
INJ |
50 |
85 |
65 |
30 |
75 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
|
5 |
INJ |
3 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
T.Y. Hilton |
23 |
10.5 |
7.3 |
157 |
109 |
790 |
|
40 |
70 |
30 |
45 |
85 |
70 |
15 |
|
40 |
85 |
25 |
50 |
40 |
60 |
65 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Coby Fleener |
24 |
9.8 |
6.5 |
137.5 |
91.5 |
675 |
|
45 |
40 |
50 |
30 |
45 |
55 |
75 |
|
30 |
65 |
45 |
60 |
55 |
35 |
45 |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dwayne Allen |
23 |
8.1 |
5.1 |
122 |
76 |
520 |
|
20 |
45 |
25 |
40 |
35 |
20 |
45 |
|
55 |
15 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
45 |
25 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
General overview: Luck easily lived
up to his hype as a rookie and the Colts added to the optimism by
adding Bradshaw and Heyward-Bey in the offseason. Both one-year
deals are of the low-risk, high-reward variety; Bradshaw should
be the pass-catching complement to Ballard – at the very least
– while Heyward-Bey gets a chance to play for a good team
where he is a clear secondary option and can learn the finer points
of the game from a veteran like Wayne. The biggest transition this
season, though, may be the move from former OC Bruce Arians’
vertical-based offense to Pep Hamilton’s West Coast attack,
although the new play-caller has promised to carry over certain
parts of Arians’ playbook as well; he will also have the added
benefit of being familiar with Luck and Fleener from their days
together at Stanford. While there will be more emphasis placed on
a physical running game under Hamilton, Luck will remain the unquestioned
centerpiece of the offense. Wayne turned in his fourth career 100-catch
season in 2012 during his age-34 season, but the fact that he will
turn 35 in November may have given the team enough of a reason to
begin the shift in offensive philosophy this season. Fleener should
help make up for any drop-off from Wayne, as Hamilton will almost
certainly use him more in space than Arians did.
Matchup analysis: There is potential
for significant peaks and valleys for the passing game, particularly
if Wayne starts to feel his age a bit this season. The Colts face
the top two NFC West defenses, Denver and Miami over the first
seven weeks, all of which should be able to generate a significant
pass rush and play a bit of coverage as well. Houston and St.
Louis represent two of the best defenses Indianapolis will face
over the second half of the schedule before the fantasy postseason,
although the fantasy playoff slate could be the most challenging
multi-week stretch of the season for Wayne & Co. if the Bengals,
Texans and Chiefs are all healthy at that point. As dominant as
the receivers should be in the first half, the tight ends could
easily take over in the second half. As a result, both Allen and
Fleener could (and probably should) be midseason trade targets
in fantasy. The emphasis on the running game is a noble one in
theory, but did the Colts do enough up front to succeed against
10 opponents (during the fantasy schedule) who finished in the
top half of rush defense – in terms of YPC – last
season? Bradshaw and Ballard face a number of those teams over
the first nine weeks of the season, making them possible fantasy
trade-deadline targets as well.
Jacksonville Jaguars |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KC |
OAK |
SEA |
IND |
STL |
DEN |
SD |
SF |
bye |
TEN |
ARI |
HOU |
CLE |
HOU |
BUF |
TEN |
QB |
Chad Henne |
28 |
15.3 |
15.3 |
230.1 |
230.1 |
3440 |
|
230 |
275 |
130 |
275 |
260 |
145 |
245 |
195 |
|
310 |
210 |
185 |
260 |
225 |
230 |
265 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Blaine Gabbert |
23 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
10.6 |
10.6 |
165 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
65 |
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
10 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
M
Jones-Drew |
28 |
14.6 |
11.8 |
219.5 |
176.5 |
1035 |
|
70 |
90 |
55 |
80 |
60 |
40 |
70 |
45 |
|
80 |
55 |
65 |
75 |
85 |
55 |
110 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
15 |
25 |
40 |
15 |
30 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
|
20 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Justin Forsett |
27 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
32.5 |
23.5 |
165 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
|
25 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Denard Robinson |
22 |
4.6 |
3.5 |
68.5 |
52.5 |
240 |
|
10 |
35 |
5 |
45 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
|
0 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
40 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
25 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
30 |
0 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Cecil Shorts |
25 |
13.9 |
9.3 |
209 |
140 |
1040 |
|
75 |
100 |
60 |
90 |
85 |
40 |
75 |
70 |
|
110 |
40 |
30 |
50 |
65 |
45 |
105 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
5 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
7 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Justin Blackmon |
23 |
13.5 |
8.4 |
149 |
92 |
680 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
40 |
70 |
45 |
65 |
|
80 |
90 |
55 |
75 |
40 |
55 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
4 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
|
7 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jordan Shipley |
27 |
3.3 |
1.6 |
40 |
19 |
190 |
|
30 |
15 |
15 |
45 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
0 |
40 |
5 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ace Sanders |
21 |
2.6 |
1.5 |
39 |
23 |
170 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
|
0 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
35 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
M
Massaquoi |
26 |
4 |
2.6 |
60.5 |
38.5 |
325 |
|
35 |
55 |
25 |
55 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
45 |
35 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Marcedes Lewis |
29 |
11.2 |
7.2 |
168.5 |
107.5 |
655 |
|
40 |
55 |
45 |
35 |
60 |
60 |
55 |
45 |
|
65 |
20 |
35 |
30 |
20 |
45 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
|
6 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
|
General overview: Ex-HC Mike Mularkey
had little chance to leave his mark in his one year with the Jaguars,
especially after Jones-Drew was lost for the season after only six
games. Mularkey was let go and former Seattle Seahawks DC Gus Bradley
was chosen to replace him. As first-time head coaches typically
do, Bradley opted for a familiar face in OC Jedd Fisch, who worked
with him as an assistant on the Seahawks’ staff a few years
ago. While the offensive outlook appears bleak with Gabbert and
Henne fighting for the right to start under center, Jacksonville
has quietly assembled a fair amount of skill-position talent that
could thrive in Fisch’s up-tempo offense. Shorts went from
a raw rookie in 2011 to a polished receiver last season and could
be the latest in a growing line of receivers to take advantage of
spending part of his summer training with Larry Fitzgerald. Blackmon
did himself no favors by landing a four-game suspension for violating
the league’s substance-abuse policy, which will give Massaquoi
a chance to shine in September. Lewis has shown he can be an asset
in the red zone and is coming off a 50-catch season. Robinson is
listed as a running back, but will almost certainly be used in his
preferred “offensive weapon” position as one of Fisch’s
more versatile chess pieces. However, the offense will go only as
far as Jones-Drew can take it, assuming his career workload doesn’t
catch up to him in 2013. Matchup analysis:
It is conceivable that MJD has one more banner season –
in a contract year no less – but he’s not going to
catch a lot of breaks against a rather unforgiving run schedule.
The team added highly-regarded LT Luke Joeckel (who will play
on the right side in 2013) in the draft, but did little to improve
the interior of the line, where Jones-Drew typically does the
majority of his damage. Furthermore, the Jags may get off to a
slow start running the ball regardless as they will be attempting
to become one of a growing number of teams to embrace the zone-blocking
scheme. The second half of the schedule looks more manageable
for MJD, Forsett and possibly even Robinson with three straight
home games to close out the fantasy season, but all three opponents
should be better stopping the run than they were last season.
Those teams (Houston, Buffalo and Tennessee) could also put together
enough offense to force the Jags to abandon their running game
early in the second half as well. Shorts has a treacherous slate
to navigate, with many of his snaps coming against the likes of
Brandon Flowers, Richard Sherman, Champ Bailey, Patrick Peterson,
Johnathan Joseph (twice) and Stephon Gilmore. Blackmon probably
won’t draw near the attention Shorts will and, as a result,
could be a fantasy playoff stud if the new staff can get him to
maximize his potential. Lewis should have an easier path to success
than his receiver brethren and could emerge as a valuable contributor
for the first time since 2010 assuming Henne wins the job, but
only time will tell if Bradley and Fisch come to the same conclusion
most fantasy owners have already reached about what quarterback
should be starting.
Tennessee Titans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIT |
HOU |
SD |
NYJ |
KC |
SEA |
SF |
bye |
STL |
JAC |
IND |
OAK |
IND |
DEN |
ARI |
JAC |
QB |
Jake Locker |
25 |
16.5 |
16.5 |
247.3 |
247.3 |
3370 |
|
230 |
215 |
260 |
185 |
260 |
105 |
125 |
|
250 |
315 |
305 |
250 |
265 |
90 |
240 |
275 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
15 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
40 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
35 |
15 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Ryan Fitzpatrick |
30 |
9 |
9 |
27 |
27 |
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Chris Johnson |
27 |
17.3 |
13.9 |
260 |
209 |
1265 |
|
65 |
75 |
90 |
105 |
125 |
35 |
50 |
|
75 |
65 |
100 |
150 |
70 |
65 |
85 |
110 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
30 |
15 |
20 |
40 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
|
45 |
35 |
25 |
20 |
55 |
35 |
25 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
4 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Shonn Greene |
28 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
93.5 |
88.5 |
485 |
|
20 |
30 |
35 |
20 |
45 |
45 |
20 |
|
15 |
50 |
40 |
65 |
25 |
15 |
35 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kenny Britt |
24 |
12.8 |
8.8 |
192.5 |
131.5 |
955 |
|
65 |
40 |
90 |
15 |
75 |
25 |
55 |
|
70 |
125 |
130 |
70 |
40 |
55 |
35 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
5 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
5 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nate Washington |
30 |
7.5 |
4.8 |
112.5 |
72.5 |
545 |
|
40 |
75 |
35 |
20 |
45 |
10 |
35 |
|
45 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
45 |
10 |
45 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kendall Wright |
23 |
11.1 |
7.4 |
166.5 |
110.5 |
805 |
|
55 |
45 |
75 |
55 |
80 |
30 |
35 |
|
15 |
75 |
55 |
105 |
25 |
40 |
70 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Justin Hunter |
22 |
4.4 |
3 |
57.5 |
39.5 |
275 |
|
15 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
15 |
INJ |
15 |
INJ |
35 |
45 |
25 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
INJ |
1 |
INJ |
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Damian Williams |
25 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
28 |
14 |
140 |
|
0 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
35 |
20 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Delanie Walker |
29 |
4.5 |
2.5 |
67.5 |
37.5 |
255 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
20 |
15 |
|
15 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
15 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Taylor Thompson |
23 |
3.6 |
2.1 |
54 |
31 |
250 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
|
35 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
25 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
General overview: Perhaps no team
upgraded their offensive line in the offseason more than the Titans.
LT Michael Roos and RT David Stewart held up fine for the most part
in 2012, but the interior of the line was among the worst in football.
As has become the norm, Johnson was once again slammed for his lack
of consistency and bore the brunt of the shoddy blocking. As a result,
Tennessee landed the best guard on the free-agent market in Andy
Levitre, drafted Chance Warmack to play on the right side and grabbed
a center in Brian Schwenke who could give Fernando Velasco a run
for his money at the pivot. All of this was necessary in order to
fix an offense that wants to get back to running the football like
it did in Johnson’s early years. The Titans also didn’t
stop with the line, signing ex-Jet Greene to take the goal-line
work and free up Johnson to do more in the passing game. The offensive
line shift was also necessary to give Locker every chance to succeed.
Freed from the mind-boggling conservative play-calling of ex-OC
Chris Palmer, OC Dowell Loggains anticipates using the running game
and a talented group of receivers – all of which have deep-ball
abilities – to accentuate the arm strength and athleticism
of his third-year signal-caller. Wright dropped nearly 15 pounds
while Britt had a quiet and healthy offseason, which is important
if Tennessee has any hopes of allowing Locker to succeed long-term.
Matchup analysis: Unless the rebuilt
offensive line quickly establishes itself as one of the league’s
most dominant units, it is highly likely that critics of Johnson
(and his inconsistency in fantasy) will have plenty to chirp about
through the first 9-10 weeks of the season. It is during this
time that it will be important that Johnson is playing a key role
in the passing game if he has any hope to prove them wrong. And
while part of Greene’s new role will be to keep CJ2K fresh,
it isn’t as if Johnson’s speed or Greene’s power
figure to be all that effective against the Steelers, Texans,
Chargers or the three NFC West teams they will face from Week
6-9. Starting in Week 10, however, Johnson and Greene could pay
off in a big way behind an offensive line that will have worked
out most of its timing issues, increasing the chances both of
Tennessee’s backs will be solid fantasy trade-deadline options.
The same can basically be said about Locker & Co., but a slow
start against a brutal schedule could end up getting him benched
– if he doesn’t get injured first. If Locker has any
degree of fantasy success against his early opponents, it might
be because he is a solid bet to rush for 20-40 yards per game.
Britt, like Johnson, is a matchup nightmare that has the talent
to put up strong fantasy numbers against any opponent. If he can
flash 2010 or early 2011 form in September, the team’s other
receivers (Washington, Wright and Hunter) all have enough talent
to post huge games against single coverage. But for this offense
to maximize its potential, Johnson has to draw up the extra defender,
Locker has to be accurate enough to make the defense pay for it
and Britt has to stay healthy.
NFC South
Atlanta Falcons |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO |
STL |
MIA |
NE |
NYJ |
|
TB |
ARI |
CAR |
SEA |
TB |
NO |
BUF |
GB |
WAS |
SF |
QB |
Matt Ryan |
28 |
24.3 |
24.3 |
364.5 |
364.5 |
4300 |
|
325 |
285 |
250 |
295 |
275 |
|
225 |
295 |
255 |
235 |
275 |
335 |
275 |
340 |
305 |
330 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
5 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Steven Jackson |
30 |
20.3 |
16.2 |
304 |
243 |
1170 |
|
80 |
115 |
65 |
75 |
90 |
|
55 |
80 |
105 |
65 |
40 |
100 |
75 |
85 |
65 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
35 |
40 |
20 |
35 |
35 |
|
20 |
50 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
20 |
45 |
20 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
6 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jacquizz Rodgers |
24 |
4.7 |
3.4 |
70.5 |
50.5 |
300 |
|
15 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
40 |
|
20 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
30 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
10 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
|
10 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Roddy White |
31 |
17.7 |
11.7 |
265.5 |
175.5 |
1215 |
|
90 |
70 |
110 |
70 |
85 |
|
75 |
45 |
75 |
55 |
70 |
120 |
55 |
100 |
110 |
85 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
7 |
5 |
9 |
4 |
7 |
|
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Julio Jones |
24 |
19.2 |
13.2 |
287.5 |
198.5 |
1265 |
|
105 |
75 |
65 |
90 |
45 |
|
40 |
115 |
80 |
65 |
85 |
100 |
125 |
65 |
90 |
120 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
6 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
|
4 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Harry Douglas |
28 |
4.1 |
2.3 |
61 |
35 |
290 |
|
25 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
20 |
|
35 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
40 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Tony Gonzalez |
37 |
14.9 |
9.4 |
223.5 |
141.5 |
875 |
|
60 |
65 |
35 |
55 |
80 |
|
35 |
65 |
50 |
75 |
45 |
70 |
45 |
70 |
60 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
6 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
|
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
|
General overview: The mere fact that
Michael Turner did not hold this offense back in 2012 means the
Falcons’ offense could be destined for great things in 2013.
As such, the one piece that could push Atlanta over the top in the
NFC is the addition of Jackson, who is a perfect fit for this passing
offense because he is such an adept receiver and can also supply
the same kind of power that Turner did. Although the ex-Ram doesn’t
possess the same frightening size-speed combination he did in his
prime, it is entirely possible the plethora of consistent 6-7 man
boxes he will see will enable him to post the second-best fantasy
season of his career in his age-30 season. Perhaps spurred somewhat
by Jackson’s signing, Gonzalez delayed retirement to take
one more stab at a Super Bowl. And it is hard to blame him: Ryan
has done nothing but improve in each of his five seasons, White
still appears to be in his prime and Jones is quickly emerging into
one of the elite receiving talents in the NFL, meaning Gonzalez
could make another run at 80-90 catches and 10 touchdowns at age
37. Even with a couple of older parts in the machine, no team may
field more talent at the skill positions this season than Atlanta.
Matchup analysis: In Jackson, the
passing game adds an element out of the backfield that it did
not have last season, which will come in handy as the Falcons
face a number of potentially good secondaries from the NFC West,
AFC East and in their own division (Tampa Bay). But even as good
as each of those opponents have it in their back four, only Seattle
and perhaps Tampa Bay have the talent and depth necessary to keep
Jones, White and Gonzalez somewhat in check…and that is
where Jackson’s abilities as a receiver should really make
a difference. Because so few teams have two above-average cornerbacks,
defenses that have a “shadow” cornerback will have
to pick their poison between Jones and White, with the likelihood
being that coordinators will simply try to take away the “hot”
receiver when there isn’t a clear size-speed matchup. Gonzalez
is sure to have some down weeks – if only because the receivers
could dominate their fair share of games – but with safeties
so preoccupied with the receivers, linebackers will see a lot
of time against him. Jackson himself admitted he may not be doing
a lot of running early in games this season, but there is little
doubt he will be converting his share of goal-line scores to make
up for it. Despite his age and the likelihood he might not see
300 carries, Jackson may be one of the few matchup-proof backs
in fantasy in 2013.
Carolina Panthers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEA |
BUF |
NYG |
bye |
ARI |
MIN |
STL |
TB |
ATL |
SF |
NE |
MIA |
TB |
NO |
NYJ |
NO |
QB |
Cam Newton |
24 |
24.3 |
24.3 |
364 |
364 |
3875 |
|
210 |
265 |
315 |
|
310 |
275 |
265 |
185 |
265 |
230 |
270 |
305 |
195 |
330 |
190 |
265 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
670 |
|
40 |
80 |
25 |
|
50 |
25 |
60 |
20 |
60 |
40 |
20 |
35 |
45 |
55 |
45 |
70 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
DeAngelo Williams |
30 |
6.1 |
5.3 |
92 |
80 |
520 |
|
35 |
35 |
60 |
|
20 |
15 |
35 |
10 |
55 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
20 |
35 |
25 |
90 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
10 |
5 |
20 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jonathan Stewart |
26 |
12 |
9.5 |
168.5 |
133.5 |
725 |
|
INJ |
40 |
50 |
|
75 |
60 |
65 |
45 |
35 |
50 |
65 |
40 |
30 |
55 |
80 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
INJ |
10 |
15 |
|
15 |
30 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
5 |
20 |
25 |
10 |
30 |
5 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
INJ |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike Tolbert |
27 |
4.4 |
2.9 |
66 |
43 |
90 |
|
15 |
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
10 |
15 |
30 |
|
5 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Steve Smith |
34 |
15.6 |
10.7 |
234 |
161 |
1130 |
|
55 |
80 |
90 |
|
115 |
85 |
70 |
30 |
85 |
55 |
80 |
120 |
50 |
105 |
35 |
75 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
4 |
5 |
7 |
|
5 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandon LaFell |
26 |
8.5 |
5.5 |
128 |
82 |
640 |
|
35 |
75 |
30 |
|
55 |
45 |
30 |
70 |
35 |
40 |
35 |
55 |
20 |
60 |
15 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
2 |
5 |
3 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Domenik Hixon |
28 |
8.1 |
4.8 |
97 |
57 |
450 |
|
30 |
25 |
45 |
|
40 |
25 |
65 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
45 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
35 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
3 |
2 |
5 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ted
Ginn Jr. |
28 |
2.8 |
1.5 |
42 |
22 |
220 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
|
15 |
35 |
0 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Armanti Edwards |
25 |
2.8 |
1.5 |
42 |
22 |
220 |
|
20 |
0 |
5 |
|
10 |
15 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
30 |
35 |
5 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Greg Olsen |
28 |
11 |
7.1 |
164.5 |
106.5 |
705 |
|
35 |
55 |
70 |
|
55 |
20 |
50 |
35 |
45 |
65 |
40 |
50 |
35 |
35 |
70 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
3 |
5 |
6 |
|
4 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
|
General overview: From the time they
first came into existence back in 1995, the Panthers have been known
primarily as a running team – something that doesn’t
figure to change anytime soon. To what degree they will try to pound
opponents into submission this season, however, depends a lot on
how quickly Stewart is able to return to the field. The sixth-year
back is still having “issues” with his right ankle following
offseason surgery, so while Carolina boasts impressive depth in
Williams and Tolbert, neither player can provide everything he does
in the same package. New OC Mike Shula wants to implement an up-tempo
offense and has gone to great lengths this offseason to make sure
Newton is spending less time in the huddle, but the Panthers did
little to upgrade his supporting cast outside of bringing in a quality
– yet injury-prone – third receiver in Hixon. Shula
has promised to stick with the same base offense that helped contribute
to Carolina’s 5-1 record to end last season (including four
straight wins to close out 2012), with the hope being that Newton
and Stewart can make opponents respect the run enough that Smith
and Olsen can exploit single coverage down the field on a regular
basis.
Matchup analysis: The running game
will ideally be more of a two-pronged attack between Newton and
Stewart, although it is possible Shula’s hand might be forced
into a three-man committee if the latter cannot start the season.
Either way, there isn’t a great deal to get excited about
with only two favorable matchups all season – and that’s
assuming Saints DC Rob Ryan doesn’t drastically improve
the run defense – and the likelihood that Newton will command
about a third of the rushing yards in this offense. The news is
better for the passing game, where the slate is clear for LaFell
to have a banner year if he can hold off Hixon – which appears
likely at this point. Smith will have his fair share of difficult
matchups – such as Richard Sherman and Stephon Gilmore –
before the bye and Patrick Peterson, Darrelle Revis (twice) and
Antonio Cromartie after it, but it is not an overly daunting schedule
overall for a player whose diminutive size makes him a different
kind of matchup nightmare. With no real threat – outside
of Olsen – for targets, Smith could (and probably should)
return to 2011 fantasy form. The loss of tight end aficionado
OC Rob Chudzinski could mean less of a role for Olsen. The Saints
have enough talent at safety now to match up with him in the fantasy
playoffs, although his matchups the rest of the season should
keep his value about where it has been since he became a Panther.
New Orleans Saints |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATL |
TB |
ARI |
MIA |
CHI |
NE |
bye |
BUF |
NYJ |
DAL |
SF |
ATL |
SEA |
CAR |
STL |
CAR |
QB |
Drew Brees |
34 |
26.8 |
26.8 |
402.5 |
402.5 |
4850 |
|
325 |
280 |
350 |
360 |
370 |
305 |
|
335 |
315 |
390 |
270 |
225 |
320 |
350 |
330 |
325 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mark Ingram |
23 |
9.8 |
8.7 |
147 |
131 |
730 |
|
50 |
25 |
55 |
35 |
30 |
55 |
|
55 |
80 |
60 |
25 |
40 |
25 |
85 |
65 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
|
15 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Pierre Thomas |
28 |
10.4 |
7.7 |
156.5 |
115.5 |
540 |
|
35 |
45 |
15 |
45 |
35 |
35 |
|
15 |
55 |
40 |
35 |
55 |
40 |
20 |
50 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
315 |
|
25 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
50 |
25 |
|
20 |
5 |
15 |
15 |
35 |
15 |
40 |
15 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Darren Sproles |
30 |
17.1 |
11.5 |
256.5 |
172.5 |
520 |
|
40 |
15 |
70 |
20 |
35 |
40 |
|
25 |
15 |
55 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
65 |
20 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
30 |
35 |
75 |
35 |
65 |
30 |
|
35 |
55 |
75 |
45 |
20 |
105 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
4 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
|
4 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Marques Colston |
30 |
15.2 |
10.1 |
227.5 |
151.5 |
975 |
|
75 |
35 |
75 |
95 |
55 |
85 |
|
85 |
30 |
50 |
75 |
45 |
35 |
110 |
75 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
6 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
|
6 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lance Moore |
30 |
10.7 |
7 |
161 |
105 |
750 |
|
60 |
25 |
40 |
110 |
85 |
60 |
|
35 |
55 |
40 |
40 |
65 |
10 |
70 |
20 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
5 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Joe Morgan |
25 |
4.9 |
3.7 |
74 |
56 |
380 |
|
25 |
30 |
50 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
45 |
70 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
40 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nick Toon |
24 |
2.9 |
1.5 |
43 |
23 |
230 |
|
0 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
35 |
|
30 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jimmy Graham |
26 |
18.6 |
12.4 |
278.5 |
185.5 |
1135 |
|
85 |
70 |
75 |
50 |
105 |
40 |
|
70 |
90 |
140 |
65 |
45 |
70 |
55 |
90 |
85 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
8 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
|
5 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Ben Watson |
32 |
3.9 |
2.4 |
58 |
36 |
240 |
|
20 |
35 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
|
0 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
25 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
General overview: Without HC Sean
Payton roaming the sidelines last year, the Saints lost their way
despite posting another season’s worth of impressive offensive
numbers. The main change figures to be a recommitment to the running
game and Ingram in particular. While New Orleans will always pass
significantly more than it runs with Brees under center, it attempted
301 more throws than rushing attempts in 2012 – a far cry
from the plus-231 mark in 2011. While their awful defense played
a large role in that discrepancy, the Saints rarely made establishing
the run enough of a priority. Ingram and Thomas – both somewhat
injury-prone – will likely each average 10-12 touches per
game while Sproles should be much more involved than he was as a
runner (48 carries in 2012 after posting 87 in 2011). Despite the
renewed emphasis on the running game, New Orleans will only go as
far as Brees can take them. Sproles’ inconsistent usage and
Graham’s wrist injury were perhaps the most frustrating parts
of last season and should not be a concern for either this season.
Colston and Moore return to their usual roles, but the team will
need someone like Morgan to put a firm grasp on the situational
deep threat role that Devery Henderson held for many years in “The
Big Easy”.
Matchup analysis: Few opponents
have a player that can cover Graham or Sproles – let alone
both – with one defender and even fewer have more than two
cornerbacks to keep Colston and Moore in check as well. The early
slate is very encouraging for Brees and Sproles while Graham should
really excel over the second half of the season. Colston works
out of the slot more than half the time (55.7% in 2012 per Pro
Football Focus), making Graham or injuries the biggest obstacles
between him and a 90-catch season. Only Seattle boasts three corners
(including new slot CB Antoine Winfield) that can realistically
expect to bottle him up no matter where he lines up. Moore is
a bit more of a wild-card, but should be a joy to own in the fantasy
playoffs. Because the Saints employ a three-man running back committee
based on situation, it does little good to put much stock in the
matchup – outside of Ingram against a stout run defense.
Therefore, Sproles will receive no red boxes by his name while
Thomas will see very few given his contributions in the passing
game. Payton has worked Ingram into the passing-game mix more
often than usual this offseason, which will come in handy during
the first half of the schedule if it carries over to Sundays.
The back end of the schedule should not be nearly as difficult
as the first half, which should allow Ingram to finally live up
to his first-round draft-pick status – should he remain
healthy that long.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYJ |
NO |
NE |
ARI |
bye |
PHI |
ATL |
CAR |
SEA |
MIA |
ATL |
DET |
CAR |
BUF |
SF |
STL |
QB |
Josh Freeman |
25 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
311.7 |
311.7 |
3830 |
|
235 |
325 |
205 |
315 |
|
335 |
215 |
230 |
195 |
295 |
305 |
255 |
245 |
175 |
220 |
280 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
5 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
|
15 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Doug Martin |
24 |
22.1 |
18.1 |
331 |
271 |
1420 |
|
110 |
125 |
80 |
105 |
|
85 |
70 |
140 |
55 |
85 |
120 |
85 |
85 |
105 |
70 |
100 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
510 |
|
35 |
40 |
25 |
60 |
|
30 |
15 |
25 |
45 |
25 |
70 |
40 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Michael Smith |
25 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
22.5 |
17.5 |
135 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
15 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Vincent Jackson |
30 |
16.4 |
11.7 |
246 |
176 |
1160 |
|
40 |
115 |
70 |
65 |
|
125 |
80 |
70 |
35 |
110 |
65 |
80 |
65 |
45 |
85 |
110 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
2 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
|
8 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Williams |
26 |
14.6 |
10.4 |
219.5 |
155.5 |
1015 |
|
80 |
90 |
55 |
100 |
|
70 |
50 |
45 |
55 |
100 |
75 |
40 |
85 |
75 |
55 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
|
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kevin Ogletree |
26 |
5.6 |
3.4 |
83.5 |
50.5 |
385 |
|
30 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
|
35 |
40 |
30 |
10 |
40 |
15 |
45 |
30 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Tiquan Underwood |
26 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
59 |
41 |
290 |
|
20 |
35 |
0 |
35 |
|
15 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
20 |
50 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Tom Crabtree |
27 |
5.1 |
3.1 |
76.5 |
46.5 |
345 |
|
25 |
10 |
30 |
25 |
|
50 |
20 |
15 |
35 |
0 |
20 |
40 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
General overview: Unlike the beginning
of last season, Martin is the clear-cut feature back and the focal
point of the offense. Outside of a possible upgrade at the third
receiver spot and downgrade at tight end, the skill positions remain
mostly the same. However, the one big difference from last year
is the Bucs should more than seven combined games from guards Carl
Nicks and Davin Joseph. Although Tampa Bay will likely remain a
run-oriented offense for as long as HC Greg Schiano is in charge,
the time is now for Freeman to make the leap to near-elite quarterbacks
that many thought he was capable of following the 2010 season. With
Martin a 50-60 catch threat out of the backfield and the weekly
mismatch that Jackson and Williams often provide, the fifth-year
signal-caller should finally reach his comfort zone in his second
year under OC Mike Sullivan. A review of his eight interceptions
– which accounted for nearly half of his total for the season
– over Weeks 15-16 reveal that Freeman made some poor decisions,
but was also hung out to dry on several occasions as well. After
suggesting there would be competition for the starting job in the
offseason following Freeman’s late-season demise, Schiano
has made it clear recently that rookie Mike Glennon is not a threat
to the starting job. With better luck in the injury department up
front this season, Freeman could have a career year.
Matchup analysis: Despite four
difficult matchups, it would be unwise to suggest Martin is not
a threat for 100 total yards and a touchdown every week. It is
hard to imagine a much better first-half slate (through Week 8),
with the offensively-challenged Jets and two defenses in the Saints
and Panthers who figure to be average at best against the run.
Seattle and Miami will pose a stiff challenge in consecutive weeks,
but only San Francisco in Week 15 stands out as an opponent that
should give owners moderate concern. A quick glance at Jackson’s
schedule suggests the 30-year-old might be in for a down season,
but the combination of a dominant running game and the fact he
spends a fair amount of time in the slot (36.5% in 2012 per Pro
Football Focus) will help him be productive in a number of games
against some of the league’s best cornerbacks (such as Antonio
Cromartie and Patrick Peterson before the bye as well as Richard
Sherman and Stephon Gilmore after the break), almost none of which
will follow him inside. Due to the likelihood that few of the
Bucs’ opponents will have a suitable matchup for Williams
until the fantasy playoffs, his slate suggests he could top 1,000
yards for the first time.
Suggestions, comments, about the article or
fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today
since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview
magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long,
pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past
season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on
Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The
Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association. |